The Commissioner of Motor Vehicles may, as provided in section
4-8, appoint not more than three deputy commissioners of motor vehicles, who shall, under the direction of the commissioner, assist in the administration of the business of the department, and, when so directed by said commissioner, shall hear and determine questions that may come before the department.
(1949 Rev., S. 2356; P.A. 88-245, S. 3, 7; P.A. 96-180, S. 38, 166.)
History: P.A. 88-245 authorized commissioner to appoint not more than three deputy commissioners, where previously limited to one; P.A. 96-180 substituted “The Commissioner of Motor Vehicles” for “Said commissioner”, effective June 3, 1996.
Section does not authorize delegation of the authority of deputy commissioner to any other assistant. 151 C. 679.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
24
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1964–2026 · leading case:
State v. Thomas, 386 S.E.2d 555 (N.C. 1989).
State v. Thomas, 386 S.E.2d 555 (N.C. 1989).
· cites it 4× “Under the doctrine of acting in concert when two or more persons act together in pursuance of a common plan or purpose, each is guilty of any crime committed by any other in pursuance of the common plan or purpose. State v. Barts, 316 N.”
Rutherford v. Slagle, 334 A.3d 988 (Conn. 2025).
· cites it 9× “shall, subsequent to the filing of the appeal, follow the same course of pleading as that followed in ordinary civil actions.”
State v. Bunch, 689 S.E.2d 866 (N.C. 2010).
· cites it 2× “C.G.S. § 14-7, and (2) a related killing.”
State v. Mann, 560 S.E.2d 776 (N.C. 2002).
“C.G.S. § 14-7, and (2) a related killing.”
Larobina v. McDonald, 876 A.2d 522 (Conn. 2005).
“Practice Book § 17-44 provides: “In any action, except administrative appeals which are not enumerated in Section 14-7, any party may move for a summary judgment at any time, except that the party must obtain the judicial authority’s permission to file a motion for summary…”
Krevis v. City of Bridgeport, 817 A.2d 628 (Conn. 2003).
“” Practice Book § 17-44 provides: “In any action, except administrative appeals which are not enumerated in Section 14-7, any party may move for a summary judgment at any time, except that the party must obtain the judicial authority’s permission to file a motion for summary…”
State v. Ysut Mlo, 440 S.E.2d 98 (N.C. 1994).
“C.G.S. § 14-7 “[separates] first degree murder into four distinct classes as determined by the proof.”
Mamudovski v. BIC Corp., 829 A.2d 47 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003).
“Practice Book § 17-44 provides in relevant part: “In any action, except administrative appeals which are not enumerated in Section 14-7, any party may move for a summary judgment at any time, except that the party must obtain the judicial authority’s permission to file a motion…”
Marchesi v. Bd. of Selectmen of Lyme, 28 A.3d 994 (Conn. App. Ct. 2011).
· cites it 2× “” Practice Book § 14-7 (d) (5). This course of pleading encompasses the motion for summary judgment.”
Beizer v. Dep't of Labor, 742 A.2d 821 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000).
“The plaintiff objected to the motion for summary judgment arguing that, pursuant to Practice Book § 14-7, summary judgment is not permitted in an administrative appeal of this type.”
State v. Roseborough, 472 S.E.2d 763 (N.C. 1996).
“C.G.S. § 14-7. Discharging a firearm into an occupied structure is a felony which will support a first degree felony murder prosecution.”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-7(d)(5): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.