(a) If the report recommends that the defendant be sentenced in accordance with the conviction, placed on probation by the court or placed on probation by the court with the requirement, as a condition of such probation, that he receive outpatient psychiatric treatment, the defendant shall be returned directly to the court for disposition. If the report recommends sentencing in accordance with the conviction and confinement in the hospital for custody, care and treatment, then during the period between the submission of the report and the disposition of the defendant by the court such defendant shall remain at the hospital and may receive such custody, care and treatment as is consistent with his medical needs.
(b) If the report recommends confinement at the hospital for custody, care and treatment, the court shall set the matter for a hearing not later than fifteen days after receipt of the report. Any evidence, including the report ordered by the court, regarding the defendant's mental condition may be introduced at the hearing by either party. Any staff member of the diagnostic unit who participated in the examination of the defendant and who signed the report may testify as to the contents of the report. The defendant may waive the court hearing.
(c) If at such hearing the court finds the defendant is not in need of custody, care and treatment at the hospital, it shall sentence the defendant in accordance with the conviction or place the defendant on probation. If the court finds that the defendant is in need of outpatient psychiatric treatment, it may place the defendant on probation on condition that the defendant receive such treatment. If the court finds the defendant to have psychiatric disabilities and to be dangerous to himself, herself or others and to require custody, care and treatment at the hospital, it shall sentence the defendant in accordance with the conviction and order confinement in the hospital for custody, care and treatment provided no court may order such confinement if the report does not recommend confinement at the hospital. The defendant shall not be subject to custody, care and treatment under sections 17a-560 to 17a-575, inclusive, beyond the maximum period specified in the sentence.
(1957, P.A. 650, S. 8; P.A. 73-245, S. 8; P.A. 80-470, S. 4, 11; P.A. 95-257, S. 20, 48, 58; P.A. 18-86, S. 39.)
History: P.A. 73-245 replaced “center”, i.e. security treatment center, with “institute”, i.e. Whiting Forensic Institute; P.A. 80-470 made previous provisions Subsecs. (a) and (c) with slight changes, adding proviso forbidding confinement at institution unless recommended by report, and inserted new Subsec. (b) re hearing on report; Sec. 17-245 transferred to Sec. 17a-567 in 1991; P.A. 95-257 substituted “have psychiatric disabilities” for “be mentally ill” and “division” for “institute”, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 18-86 replaced “division” with “hospital”, replaced reference to Sec. 17a-576 with reference to Sec. 17a-575 in Subsec. (c), and made technical changes, effective June 4, 2018.
Annotations to former section 17-245:
Statute creates rational classification designed as much to aid defendant as it is to protect rights of the state. 190 C. 327. Cited. 200 C. 224. Good conduct statutes do not require different treatment in computation of sentences between those sentenced and confined to Whiting Forensic Institute and those transferred to Whiting from correctional institutions. 205 C. 27. Cited. 210 C. 519.
Cited. 12 CA 32; 20 CA 737; 21 CA 172; 22 CA 199.
Cited. 41 CS 229.
Annotations to present section:
Section is constitutional; not in violation of separation of powers doctrine, due process or equal protection rights. 224 C. 168.
Cited. 29 CA 386. Plain language of section yields the conclusion that its direct purpose is to guide the sentencing court in the determination of the appropriate place of confinement; section does not provide authority for the presentence psychiatric evaluation to make any recommendation as to length of sentence. 184 CA 456.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
10
cases, 1992–2018 · leading case:
State v. Campbell, 617 A.2d 889 (Conn. 1992).
State v. Campbell, 617 A.2d 889 (Conn. 1992).
· cites it 18× “to 1987) § 17-245, now codified as § 17a-567, 1 which requires a *171 trial judge to follow the presentence report of the Whiting Forensic Institute 2 (Whiting or the institute) advising against commitment of a convicted defendant to the institute.”
State v. George B., 785 A.2d 573 (Conn. 2001).
· cites it 5× “After the sixty day evaluation, the court, pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-567 (c), 4 found that *784 the defendant was in need of care, custody and treatment at the Whiting Forensic Institute.”
State v. Carney, 195 A.3d 436 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018).
· cites it 4× “" Pursuant to § 17a-566(a), "[i]f the report recommends additional examination at the diagnostic unit, the court may, after a hearing, order the convicted defendant committed to the diagnostic unit of the division for a period not to exceed sixty days, except as provided in…”
State v. Wolff, 678 A.2d 1369 (Conn. 1996).
“If the report recommends additional examination at the diagnostic unit, the court may, after a hearing, order the convicted defendant committed to the diagnostic unit of the institute for a period not to exceed sixty days, except as provided in section 17a-567 provided the…”
State v. Jagiello, 615 A.2d 1051 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992).
“After taking testimony regarding the defendant’s psychiatric condition, the trial court sentenced the defendant to be committed to the custody of the commissioner of correction for a period of thirty years, and, pursuant to § 17-245 (now § 17a-567), ordered him to be confined at…”
State v. Maldonado, 725 A.2d 962 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999).
“If the report recommends additional examination at the diagnostic unit, the court may, after a hearing, order the convicted defendant committed to the diagnostic unit of the division for a period not to exceed sixty days, except as provided in section 17a-567 provided the…”
State v. Dull, 757 A.2d 1194 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000).
“If the report recommends additional examination at the diagnostic unit, the court may, after a hearing, order the convicted defendant committed to the diagnostic: unit of the division for a period not to exceed sixty days, except as provided *582 in section 17a-567 provided the…”
Pladsen v. Comm'r of Corr., 902 A.2d 704 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-567 (a), the trial court may not order a defendant to be confined at Whiting unless the report of the presentence psychiatric examination recommends such confinement.”
State v. Relliford, 775 A.2d 351 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001).
“If the report recommends additional examination at the diagnostic unit, the court may, after a hearing, order the convicted defendant committed to the diagnostic unit of the division for a period not to exceed sixty days, except as provided in section 17a-567 provided the…”
State v. Kennison, 774 A.2d 987 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001).
“If the report recommends additional examination at the diagnostic unit, the court may, after a hearing, order the convicted defendant committed to the diagnostic unit of the division for a period not to exceed sixty days, except as provided in section 17a-567 provided the…”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-567(a): 1 case
State v. Carney, 195 A.3d 436 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018).
“" Pursuant to § 17a-566(a), "[i]f the report recommends additional examination at the diagnostic unit, the court may, after a hearing, order the convicted defendant committed to the diagnostic unit of the division for a period not to exceed sixty days, except as provided in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.