Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 17a — SOCIAL AND HUMAN SERVICES AND RESOURCES · Chapter 319i — Persons with Psychiatric Disabilities
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582 (2026)

(Formerly Sec. 17-257c). Confinement of acquittee for examination. Court order of commitment to board or discharge

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) When any person charged with an offense is found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect pursuant to section 53a-13, the court shall order such acquittee committed to the custody of the Commissioner of Mental Health and Addiction Services who shall cause such acquittee to be confined, pending an order of the court pursuant to subsection (e) of this section, in any of the state hospitals for psychiatric disabilities or to the custody of the Commissioner of Developmental Services, for an examination to determine his mental condition.

(b) Not later than sixty days after the order of commitment pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the superintendent of such hospital or the Commissioner of Developmental Services shall cause the acquittee to be examined and file a report of the examination with the court, and shall send a copy thereof to the state's attorney and counsel for the acquittee, setting forth the superintendent's or said commissioner's findings and conclusions as to whether the acquittee is a person who should be discharged. The report shall indicate whether the acquittee submitted or refused to submit to the taking of a blood or other biological sample pursuant to subsection (c) of section 54-102g.

(c) Not later than ten days after receipt of such superintendent's or said commissioner's report, either the state's attorney or counsel for the acquittee may file notice of intent to perform a separate examination of the acquittee. An examination conducted on behalf of the acquittee may be performed by a psychiatrist or psychologist chosen by the acquittee and shall be performed at the acquittee's expense unless the acquittee is indigent. If the acquittee is indigent, the court shall provide the acquittee with the services of a psychiatrist or psychologist to perform the examination at the expense of the state. The superintendent or said commissioner who conducted the initial examination shall, not later than five days after a request of any party conducting a separate examination pursuant to this subsection, release to such party all records and reports compiled in the initial examination of the acquittee. Any separate examination report shall be filed with the court not later than thirty days after the filing with the court of the initial examination report by the superintendent or said commissioner.

(d) The court shall commence a hearing not later than fifteen days after its receipt of any separate examination report or if no notice of intent to perform a separate examination has been filed under subsection (c) of this section, not later than twenty-five days after the filing of such initial examination report.

(e) At the hearing, the court shall make a finding as to the mental condition of the acquittee and, considering that its primary concerns are the protection of society and the safety and well-being of the acquittee, make one of the following orders:

(1) If the court finds that the acquittee is a person who should be confined or conditionally released, the court shall order the acquittee committed to the jurisdiction of the board and either confined in a hospital for psychiatric disabilities or placed with the Commissioner of Developmental Services, for custody, care and treatment pending a hearing before the board pursuant to section 17a-583; provided (A) the court shall fix a maximum term of commitment, not to exceed the maximum sentence that could have been imposed if the acquittee had been convicted of the offense, and (B) if there is reason to believe that the acquittee is a person who should be conditionally released, the court shall include in the order a recommendation to the board that the acquittee be considered for conditional release pursuant to subdivision (2) of section 17a-584; or

(2) If the court finds that the acquittee is a person who should be discharged, the court shall order the acquittee discharged from custody.

(f) At the hearing before the court, the acquittee shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the acquittee is a person who should be discharged.

(g) An order of the court pursuant to subsection (e) of this section may be appealed by the acquittee or the state's attorney to the Appellate Court. The court shall so notify the acquittee.

(h) During any term of commitment to the board, the acquittee shall remain under the jurisdiction of the board until discharged by the court pursuant to section 17a-593. Except as provided in subsection (c) of said section, the acquittee shall be immediately discharged at the expiration of the maximum term of commitment.

(i) On committing an acquittee to the jurisdiction of the board, the court shall advise the acquittee of the right to a hearing before the board in accordance with section 17a-583.

(P.A. 85-506, S. 3, 32; P.A. 87-486, S. 2; P.A. 95-257, S. 11, 48, 58; P.A. 06-91, S. 2; P.A. 07-73, S. 2(b); P.A. 11-144, S. 3; P.A. 22-45, S. 3.)

History: P.A. 87-486 amended Subsec. (a) to permit the court to commit the acquittee to the custody of the commissioner of mental retardation, amended Subsecs. (b) and (c) to add references to the commissioner of mental retardation, and amended Subsec. (e) to include the situation where the court finds that the acquittee is a person who should be conditionally released and to permit the court to commit the acquittee to the jurisdiction of the board for placement with the commissioner of mental retardation; Sec. 17-257c transferred to Sec. 17a-582 in 1991; P.A. 95-257 replaced Commissioner and Department of Mental Health with Commissioner and Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services and substituted “psychiatric disabilities” for “mental illness”, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 06-91 amended Subsec. (b) by making a technical change and extending, from 45 to 60 days, the time period for examining an acquittee committed to the custody of the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services following an order of commitment, and amended Subsecs. (c), (d) and (f) by making technical changes; pursuant to P.A. 07-73 “Commissioner of Mental Retardation” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “Commissioner of Developmental Services”, effective October 1, 2007; P.A. 11-144 amended Subsec. (b) to require report to indicate whether acquittee submitted or refused to submit to taking of blood or other biological sample pursuant to Sec. 54-102g(c); P.A. 22-45 amended Subsec. (e)(1) by requiring consideration of the safety and well-being of the acquittee.

Annotations to former section 17-257c:

Cited. 211 C. 591.

Cited. 12 CA 32; 15 CA 74; judgment reversed, see 211 C. 591; 20 CA 96.

Annotations to present section:

Cited. 230 C. 400.

Subsec. (a):

Finding required of the court by Subsec. (c) is plain and unambiguous. 88 CA 125.

Subsec. (e):

Re predecessor statute, Sec. 53a-47, both concurrent and consecutive sentencing apply to commitments following insanity acquittals. 297 C. 524.

Court must make required findings of fact, which include that acquitee is a danger to himself or others because of psychiatric disability, before ordering commitment to jurisdiction of board, and case must be remanded for articulation of basis for decision. 95 CA 31.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 45 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: State v. Long, 847 A.2d 862 (Conn. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Long, 847 A.2d 862 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 20× “3 Pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582 (a), 4 the trial court then committed the defen *512 dant to the jurisdiction of the commissioner of mental health and addiction services (commissioner) for initial confinement and examination.”
State v. Metz, 645 A.2d 965 (Conn. 1994). · cites it 22× “, found the defendant not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect and committed him to the custody of the commissioner of mental health, pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582 (e) (1), 1 for the maximum allowable period of six years.”
Connelly v. Comm'r of Corr., 780 A.2d 903 (Conn. 2001). · cites it 14× “ds in having his acquittal vacated and, following a retrial, is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment, is entitled, under General Statutes § 53a-38 (c), 2 to credit *397 toward his prison sentence for the period that he was confined in a mental health facility…”
State v. Harris, 890 A.2d 559 (Conn. 2006). · cites it 16× “Thereafter, the trial court conducted a hearing pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582 (d) and (e) 4 and determined that the acquittee was *381 a person who should be confined.”
State v. Anderson, 203 A.3d 683 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 13× “where he received a psychiatric evaluation pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582. 3 The October 23, 2013 report resulting from that evaluation recommended that the defendant be returned to prison.”
State v. Kalman, 868 A.2d 766 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 14× “The acquittee, Robert Kalman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court committing him to the jurisdiction of the psychiatric security review board (board) for a term of thirty-five years and ordering him confined under maximum security conditions at the Whiting Forensic…”
Duperry v. Solnit, 803 A.2d 287 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 5× “Following the petitioner’s acquittal, the trial court ordered, pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582, 4 *315 that the petitioner be committed to the custody of the psychiatric security review board (board) to be confined in a hospital for psychiatric disabilities for a maximum…”
State v. Peters, 872 A.2d 532 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 7× “He seeks plain error review of his unpreserved claim that in making the requisite findings for commitment pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582, the court failed to apply the statutorily mandated standards of General Statutes § 17a-580 as interpreted by State v.”
State v. Webber, 225 Conn. App. 16 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 12× “Webber confinement in a hospital for psychiatric disabilities pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582 (e) (1).9 The legislature has not defined either ‘‘prison’’ or ‘‘jail’’ in § 54-255 or in § 54-250, which sets forth defini- tions for other words and phrases used in Megan’s Law.”
State v. Lindo, 955 A.2d 576 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 8× “General Statutes § 17a-582 (a). After the acquittee is examined, the court holds a hearing to determine whether the acquittee should be confined, conditionally released or discharged.”
State v. Jacob, 798 A.2d 974 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 4× “3 On July 13, 1987, following an initial commitment to the custody of the commissioner of *669 mental health and addiction services for a psychiatric evaluation pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-582 (a), the court, W.”
Kalman v. Carre, 352 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D. Conn. 2005). · cites it 9× “Section 17a-582 further provides that a person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect may contest a court’s order regarding confinement or conditional release.”
Show all 45 citing cases →
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(a) — 2 cases
Kalman v. Carre, 352 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D. Conn. 2005). “Section 17a-582 further provides that a person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect may contest a court’s order regarding confinement or conditional release.”
Dyous v. Mental Health & Addiction Servs. (D. Conn. 2024).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(b) — 2 cases
Kalman v. Carre, 352 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D. Conn. 2005). “Section 17a-582 further provides that a person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect may contest a court’s order regarding confinement or conditional release.”
Dyous v. Mental Health & Addiction Servs. (D. Conn. 2024).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(d) — 1 case
Dyous v. Mental Health & Addiction Servs. (D. Conn. 2024).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(e) — 1 case
Kalman v. Carre, 352 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D. Conn. 2005). “Section 17a-582 further provides that a person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect may contest a court’s order regarding confinement or conditional release.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(e)(1) — 1 case
Dyous v. Mental Health & Addiction Servs. (D. Conn. 2024).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(e)(2) — 1 case
Dyous v. Mental Health & Addiction Servs. (D. Conn. 2024).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(g) — 1 case
Kalman v. Carre, 352 F. Supp. 2d 205 (D. Conn. 2005). “Section 17a-582 further provides that a person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect may contest a court’s order regarding confinement or conditional release.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-582(h) — 1 case
DuPerry v. Kirk, 563 F. Supp. 2d 370 (D. Conn. 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.