Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17b-606 (2025)

(Formerly Sec. 17-606). Information on services for persons with disabilities

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The Department of Social Services shall maintain on the department's Internet web site information on services provided to persons with disabilities. The department's Internet web site shall include a link to the Internet web page maintained by the Department of Aging and Disability Services pursuant to section 17a-838 containing information about services for deaf, deafblind and hard of hearing individuals.

(P.A. 88-309, S. 1, 6; P.A. 93-262, S. 1, 87; P.A. 22-31, S. 3; P.A. 24-134, S. 1.)

History: Sec. 17-31uu transferred to Sec. 17-606 in 1991; P.A. 93-262 authorized substitution of commissioner and department of social services for commissioner and department of human resources, effective July 1, 1993; Sec. 17-606 transferred to Sec. 17b-606 in 1995; P.A. 22-31 added Subsec. (d) re Internet web site information on services for persons with disabilities and link to Department of Aging and Disability Services Internet web page; P.A. 24-134 deleted Subsecs. (a) to (c) re department's lead agency role for persons with disabilities and establishment of advisory council and interagency management committee for services for such persons and deleted Subsec. (d) designator, effective June 6, 2024.

Cited. 39 CA 216.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: Cameron v. Alander, 664 A.2d 332 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995).
Cameron v. Alander, 664 A.2d 332 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). · cites it 5× “to 1991) § 17-571 (b) 4 and General Statutes § 17b-606 *220 (a). 5 The trial court held that the regulations excluding services provided by the plaintiffs spouse from reimbursement under the community based services program were “not inconsistent with the department’s broad…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.