Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 19a — PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELL-BEING · Chapter 368x — AIDS Testing and Medical Information
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-585 (2026)

Requirements for disclosure of HIV-related information

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Whenever confidential HIV-related information is disclosed it shall be accompanied by a statement in writing, whenever possible, which includes the following or substantially similar language: “This information has been disclosed to you from records whose confidentiality is protected by state law. State law prohibits you from making any further disclosure of it without the specific written consent of the person to whom it pertains, or as otherwise permitted by said law. A general authorization for the release of medical or other information is NOT sufficient for this purpose.” An oral disclosure shall be accompanied or followed by such a notice within ten days.

(b) Except for disclosures made to a federal, state, or local health officer when such disclosure is mandated or authorized by federal or state law or to persons reviewing information or records in the ordinary course of ensuring that a health facility is in compliance with applicable quality of care standards or any other authorized program evaluation, program monitoring or service review, a notation of all such disclosures shall be placed in the medical record or with any record of an HIV-related test result of a protected individual, who shall be informed of such disclosures upon request; provided for disclosures made to governmental agents requiring information necessary for payments to be made on behalf of patients or clients pursuant to contract or law, such notation need only be entered at the time the disclosure is first made.

(c) Nothing in this chapter shall limit a person's or agency's responsibility to report, investigate or disclose child protective services information pursuant to sections 17a-101, 17a-101a to 17a-101k, inclusive, 17a-103 and 46b-129a and regulations adopted pursuant to said sections.

(d) The provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall not be applicable to disclosures made pursuant to subdivision (11) of subsection (a) of section 19a-583.

(e) Except as provided in subparagraph (G) of subdivision (5) of subsection (d) of section 19a-582, nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the recording of HIV and AIDS-related information in the medical chart or medical records of a protected individual or the listing of AIDS, HIV-related illness or HIV infection in a certificate of death or autopsy report. This chapter shall not be construed to modify regulations relating to access to death certificates or autopsy reports. This chapter shall not be construed to modify the provisions of section 19a-25 or 19a-221.

(P.A. 89-246, S. 5; P.A. 93-291, S. 6; P.A. 96-246, S. 30; P.A. 09-133, S. 2.)

History: P.A. 93-291 made technical changes in Subsecs. (c) and (e); P.A. 96-246 amended Subsec. (c) by adding references to Secs. 17a-101a to 17a-101k, inclusive, and 46b-129a; P.A. 09-133 amended Subsec. (e) by making a technical change, effective July 1, 2009.

Cited. 236 C. 845.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2021 · leading case: Doe v. Marselle, 675 A.2d 835 (Conn. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Doe v. Marselle, 675 A.2d 835 (Conn. 1996). · cites it 4× “See General Statutes § 19a-583 (a) (10). 12 Finally, even when disclosure is authorized, the AIDS statute strictly limits the terms of that disclosure.”
State v. Bemer, 339 Conn. 528 (Conn. 2021). · cites it 2× “to whom confidential HIV-related information is disclosed may further disclose such information, except as provided in this section and sections 19a-584 and 19a-585’’); General Statutes § 19a-585 (containing additional safeguards against undue dissemination of HIV related test…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.