Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 3-129c (2025)

Actions re imposition of income tax on state residents by New York City

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The Attorney General may bring an action, or intervene in an action, including a class action, as attorney for any persons residing in this state, or in the name of the state as parens patriae for persons residing in this state, with respect to the imposition of the New York City personal income tax on individuals who are residents of the state of Connecticut who earn income in New York City, which tax is not imposed on individuals who are residents of the state of New York who do not reside in New York City.

(P.A. 99-215, S. 28, 29.)

History: P.A. 99-215 effective June 29, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Blumenthal v. Barnes, 804 A.2d 152 (Conn. 2002).
Blumenthal v. Barnes, 804 A.2d 152 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 2× “ction to protect interstate watercourses); General Statutes § 3-127 (with approval of governor, and in name of state, attorney general authorized to negotiate with other states concerning use, allocation or diversion of interstate watercourses); General Statutes § 3-129a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.