Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 31 — LABOR · Chapter 563 — Fair Employment Practices
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-127 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 814c, Sec. 46a-82.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1965–2001 · leading case: State v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 559 A.2d 1120 (Conn. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 559 A.2d 1120 (Conn. 1989). · cites it 21× “to 1975) § 31-127 3 because he had failed to file it with the CHRO within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination.”
City of Groton v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 362 A.2d 1359 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 45× “" General Statutes § 31-127. The complaint filed on January 10, 1968, mentioned the name and address of Pioneer only, and did not contain the name and address of Groton.”
Williams v. Comm'n On Human Rights & Opportunities, 777 A.2d 645 (Conn. 2001). · cites it 8× “These cases establish that the filing requirement of § 46a-82 (e), formerly General Statutes § 31-127, 5 was not intended as a subject matter jurisdictional bar.”
Veeder-Root Co. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 334 A.2d 443 (Conn. 1973). · cites it 34× “Moe filed with the commission a complaint against her employer, the plaintiff, the Veeder-Root Company, pursuant to the provisions of § 31-127 of the General Statutes, as amended.”
Wroblewski v. Lexington Gardens, Inc., 448 A.2d 801 (Conn. 1982). · cites it 14× “The record clearly indicates that all three corporations had prompt notice of the plaintiff's complaint and consulted freely about their response to her charges.”
Bridgeport Hosp. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 653 A.2d 782 (Conn. 1995). · cites it 4× “Payment of all monies the retiree would have received had his benefits been calculated properly by the use of a unisex actuarial table was “plainly commanded]” by General Statutes § 31-127, now codified at § 46a-86 (a).”
Angelsea Prods., Inc. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 674 A.2d 1300 (Conn. 1996). · cites it 4× “2d 771 (1971), this court stated that the “purpose of [General Statutes § 31-127, the predecessor to today’s discriminatory complaint procedure provisions] is to guard against subjecting a respondent to a hearing upon every complaint which might be made to the commission,…”
Dep't of Health Servs. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities ex rel. Mason, 503 A.2d 1151 (Conn. 1986). · cites it 5× “The present proceedings began with a complaint by the defendant Antoinette Mason to the defendant commission on human rights and opportunities (hereinafter the CHRO) pursuant to General Statutes § 31-127 (now § 46a-82).”
Ortega v. Constr. & Gen. Lab. U. No. 390, 396 F. Supp. 976 (D. Conn. 1975). · cites it 8× “Conn.Gen. Stat.Ann. § 31-127 (Supp.1975).”
Green v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 425 A.2d 122 (Conn. 1979). · cites it 5× “This case, which involves an appeal from a decision of the defendant freedom of information commission, presents the question whether complaints filed or issued pursuant to the Fair Employment Practices Act, General Statutes *701 § 31-127, are required to be disclosed under the…”
Town of West Hartford v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 407 A.2d 964 (Conn. 1978). · cites it 5× “General Statutes § 31-127 5 and Veeder-Root, supra, 331 .”
Scovill Mfg. Co. v. Comm'n on Civil Rights, 215 A.2d 130 (Conn. 1965). · cites it 8× “General Statutes § 31-127. The investigator is barred by statute from disclosing what occurred in the course of his attempts to adjust the complaint.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.