Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-296 (2026)

Voluntary agreements

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If an employer and an injured employee, or in case of fatal injury the employee's legal representative or dependent, at a date not earlier than the expiration of the waiting period, reach an agreement in regard to compensation, such agreement shall be submitted in writing to the administrative law judge by the employer with a statement of the time, place and nature of the injury upon which it is based; and, if such administrative law judge finds such agreement to conform to the provisions of this chapter in every regard, the administrative law judge shall so approve it. A copy of the agreement, with a statement of the administrative law judge's approval, shall be delivered to each of the parties and thereafter it shall be as binding upon both parties as an award by the administrative law judge. The administrative law judge's statement of approval shall also inform the employee or the employee's dependent, as the case may be, of any rights the individual may have to an annual cost-of-living adjustment or to participate in a rehabilitation program administered by the Department of Aging and Disability Services under the provisions of this chapter. The administrative law judge shall retain the original agreement, with the administrative law judge's approval thereof, in the administrative law judge's office and, if an application is made to the superior court for an execution, the administrative law judge shall, upon the request of said court, file in the court a certified copy of the agreement and statement of approval.

(b) Before discontinuing or reducing payment on account of total or partial incapacity under any such agreement, the employer or the employer's insurer, if it is claimed by or on behalf of the injured employee that such employee's incapacity still continues, shall notify the administrative law judge and the employee, in accordance with section 31-321, of the proposed discontinuance or reduction of such payments. Such notice shall specify the reason for the proposed discontinuance or reduction and the date such proposed discontinuance or reduction will commence. No discontinuance or reduction shall become effective unless specifically approved in writing by the administrative law judge. The employee may request a hearing on any such proposed discontinuance or reduction not later than fifteen days after receipt of such notice. Any such request for a hearing shall be given priority over requests for hearings on other matters. The administrative law judge shall not approve any such discontinuance or reduction prior to the expiration of the period for requesting a hearing or the completion of such hearing, whichever is later. In any case where the administrative law judge finds that an employer has discontinued or reduced any payments made in accordance with this section without the approval of the administrative law judge, such employer shall be required to pay to the employee the total amount of all payments so discontinued or the total amount by which such payments were reduced, as the case may be, and shall be required to pay interest to the employee, at a rate of one and one-quarter per cent per month or portion of a month, on any payments so discontinued or on the total amount by which such payments were reduced, as the case may be, plus reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the employee in relation to such discontinuance or reduction.

(c) The employer's or insurer's notice of intention to discontinue or reduce payments shall (1) identify the claimant, the claimant's attorney or other representative, the employer, the insurer, and the injury, including the date of the injury, the city or town in which the injury occurred and the nature of the injury, (2) include medical documentation that (A) establishes the basis for the discontinuance or reduction of payments, and (B) identifies the claimant's attending physician, physician assistant or advanced practice registered nurse, and (3) be in substantially the following form:

IMPORTANT

STATE OF CONNECTICUT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE EMPLOYER OR INSURER INTENDS TO REDUCE OR DISCONTINUE YOUR COMPENSATION PAYMENTS ON .... (date) FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:

If you object to the reduction or discontinuance of benefits as stated in this notice, YOU MUST REQUEST A HEARING NOT LATER THAN 15 DAYS after your receipt of this notice, or this notice will automatically be approved.

To request an Informal Hearing, call the Workers' Compensation Commission District Office in which your case is pending.

Be prepared to provide medical and other documentation to support your objection. For your protection, note the date when you received this notice.

(1949 Rev., S. 7444; 1953, S. 3047d; 1958 Rev., S. 31-170; 1961, P.A. 491, S. 18; 1971, P.A. 510, S. 1; P.A. 79-376, S. 44; P.A. 83-114, S. 1; P.A. 84-180, S. 1; P.A. 88-106, S. 1; P.A. 90-116, S. 6; P.A. 07-80, S. 1; P.A. 11-44, S. 48; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-1, S. 85; P.A. 19-98, S. 6; 19-157, S. 84; P.A. 21-18, S. 1; 21-196, S. 58; P.A. 22-89, S. 3.)

History: 1961 act entirely replaced previous provisions; 1971 act changed point at which discontinuance is effective from time notices are sent to commissioner to time when specifically approved in writing by commissioner; P.A. 79-376 replaced “workmen's compensation” with “workers' compensation”; P.A. 83-114 provided that the commissioner's statement of approval of a voluntary agreement shall inform the individual as to his rights for an annual cost-of-living adjustment under this chapter; P.A. 84-180 provided that the commissioner's statement of approval inform the employee of his rights to participate in a rehabilitation program; P.A. 88-106 authorized reduction of benefits; P.A. 90-116 provided that notices of discontinuance and reduction shall be made by certified mail, provided for priority hearing on discontinuances and reductions and provided for interest and attorney's fees against the employer in cases of wrongful discontinuance or reduction (Revisor's note: In 2001 the references in this section to the date “19..” were changed editorially by the Revisors to “20..” to reflect the new millennium); P.A. 07-80 divided section into Subsecs. (a), (b) and (c), made technical changes, in Subsec. (b), required notice to specify reasons for proposed discontinuance or reduction of benefits and changed from 10 days to 15 days the time for employee to request hearing and, in Subsec. (c), required specified information in notice and revised form; P.A. 11-44 amended Subsec. (a) by adding provision re rehabilitation program administered by Bureau of Rehabilitative Services, effective July 1, 2011; June 12 Sp. Sess. P.A. 12-1 amended Subsec. (a) by replacing “Bureau of Rehabilitative Services” with “Department of Rehabilitation Services”, effective July 1, 2012; P.A. 19-98 amended Subsec. (c)(2)(B) by adding “or advanced practice registered nurse”; P.A. 19-157 amended Subsec. (a) by replacing “Department of Rehabilitation Services” with “Department of Aging and Disability Services”; pursuant to P.A. 21-18, “commissioner” and “commissioner's” were changed editorially by the Revisors to “administrative law judge” and “administrative law judge's” respectively in Subsecs. (a) and (b), effective October 1, 2021; P.A. 21-196 amended Subsec. (c) by adding reference to physician assistants; P.A. 22-89 amended Subsec. (b) to delete “by certified mail” and add reference to Sec. 31-321, effective May 24, 2022.

Agreement for compensation approved by commissioner may be modified by him on facts not made known to him though known to the parties. 95 C. 356. Widow bound by agreement signed by her and late husband. 120 C. 280. Cited. 126 C. 491; 128 C. 578; 151 C. 559. Agreement by which employer waived all further claims under act was binding on him as waiver of his subrogation rights under Sec. 31-293. 157 C. 538. Cited. 159 C. 302; 177 C. 107; 231 C. 287; Id., 469; 233 C. 14; 237 C. 259. Sums paid pursuant to voluntary agreements are “compensation” and recoverable by employers or Second Injury Fund under Secs. 31-293 and 31-352. 259 C. 325.

Cited. 13 CA 208; 21 CA 464; 28 CA 113; 33 CA 490; 36 CA 298; 38 CA 754; 40 CA 36; 44 CA 771; 45 CA 324. Meaning of “voluntary agreement” as used in regulation Sec. 31-296-1 discussed; court was within discretion to deny request to execute voluntary agreement that was not a final settlement. 58 CA 45. Section procedural safeguards, postdeprivation remedies and public interest in providing speedy, effective, inexpensive method for determining workers' compensation claims are sufficient to satisfy due process requirements. 144 CA 413.

Cited. 4 CS 467; 28 CS 5; 42 CS 514.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 59 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1964–2025 · leading case: Macdermid, Inc. v. Leonetti, 183 A.3d 611 (Conn. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Macdermid, Inc. v. Leonetti, 183 A.3d 611 (Conn. 2018). · cites it 8× “" General Statutes § 31-296 (a) provides: "If an employer and an injured employee, or in case of fatal injury the employee's legal representative or dependent, at a date not earlier than the expiration of the waiting period, reach an agreement in regard to compensation, such…”

Pagan v. Carey Wiping Materials Corp., 73 A.3d 784 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 34× “The sole issue in this appeal is whether the statutory provisions that allow an employer to terminate workers’ compensation benefits under General Statutes § 31-296 prior to an evidentiary hearing deprive an injured employee of a protected property interest without due process…”

Schroeder v. Triangulum Assocs., 789 A.2d 459 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 10× “We also will address two additional issues that are likely to arise again in the new trial, namely, whether social security disability benefits are a collateral source under General Statutes § 52-225b, and whether the second injury fund (fund) is entitled to reimbursement for a…”

Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co., 823 A.2d 1223 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 12× “The parties do not dispute that General Statutes § 31-296 governs the method by which an employer may seek to discontinue benefits to an employee.”

Dos Santos v. F. D. Rich Constr. Co., 658 A.2d 83 (Conn. 1995). · cites it 12× “to 1985) § 31-296. 6 Dos Santos signed the voluntary agreement and returned it to Rich on June 28, 1988.”

Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co., 792 A.2d 835 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 7× “2d 1240 (1994) (“[a]s in the case of a voluntary agreement, no stipulation is binding until it has been approved by the commissioner”); see also General Statutes § 31-296 (requiring commissioner’s approval of voluntary agreements); General Statutes § 31-296a (requiring…”

Jones v. Town of Redding, 995 A.2d 51 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 9× “5 In March, 2003, when the parties entered into the original agreement, they had assumed that the defendant’s police department was a “paid municipal police department,” as that term is utilized in § 7-433c (a); see footnote 4 of this opinion; thereby conferring jurisdiction on…”

Second Injury Fund v. Lupachino, 695 A.2d 1072 (Conn. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 8× “On or about May 25, *326 1995, the fund filed two forms pursuant to General Statutes § 31-296 1 giving notice that it intended to discontinue or reduce the defendant’s benefits.”

Cummings v. Twin Tool Mfg. Co., 668 A.2d 1346 (Conn. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 5× “In the present case, as in Platt, the award provided for payment for a definite time period. Unlike the defendant in Platt, however, the defendants in this case discontinued payments only after making all of the payments ordered in the award.”

Sicaras v. City of Hartford, 692 A.2d 1290 (Conn. App. Ct. 1997). · cites it 4× “General Statutes § 31-296 requires the workers’ compensation commissioner to approve all agreements between employers and injured employees if the commissioner finds that the agreement conforms to the provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act.”

Carpentino v. Transp. Ins., 609 F. Supp. 556 (D. Conn. 1985). · cites it 6× “After an unspecified period of time, Transport unilaterally stopped making payments as required by the voluntary agreement, in violation of the procedures set forth under the Connecticut Worker’s Compensation Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 31-296. As discussed subsequently, the act…”

O'Neil v. Honeywell, Inc., 784 A.2d 428 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 5× “In Secóla, the commissioner declined to approve a proposed stipulation because the respondent no longer agreed to the stipulation terms, thus negating the existence of a valid agreement under General Statutes § 31-296. Secola v. State of Connecticut Comptroller’s Office, supra,…”

Show all 59 citing cases →

— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-296(a) — 1 case

Diaz v. Dept. of Soc. Servs., 195 A.3d 400 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.