Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 32 — COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT · Chapter 578 — Department of Economic and Community Development
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 32-1 (2025)

Members

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 32-1 is repealed.

(1949 Rev., S. 3536; 1961, P.A. 226, S. 1; 1971, P.A. 10, S. 2; 1972, P.A. 195, S. 14; P.A. 73-177, S. 2, 4; 73-599, S. 39.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1965–2004 · leading case: Town of Lebanon v. Woods, 215 A.2d 112 (Conn. 1965).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Lebanon v. Woods, 215 A.2d 112 (Conn. 1965). · cites it 2× “" Rhyne, Municipal Law § 32-1, p. 811. The trial court held that the regulations divided the town into two residential districts, but the opinion does not agree with this conclusion.”
In re James L., 738 A.2d 749 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999). · cites it 2× “…the respondents argue that the inclusion of the documents violated Practice Book § 10-1, formerly *342 § 108, § 32-1, formerly § 1040.1 (1) and (2), and § 32-2, formerly § 1040.1 (3) and (4). Specifically, the respondents argue that § 10-1 “excludes the attachment of…”
In re Eden F., 710 A.2d 771 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998). “There was such a summary attached to each petition, which is approximately eighteen pages and not only lists reasonable efforts the department claimed were made but also contains the following statement: “On 3/28/95, the Department of Children and Families reviewed the entire…”
Karp v. Zoning Bd., 240 A.2d 845 (Conn. 1968). · cites it 2× “Section 14 (H) of the regulations attempts to control the use of property in the city, not on the basis of the appropriate use of the land, *301 the public welfare and conformance to an established comprehensive plan, but in the personal interest of a narrowly limited class of…”
In Re Allison G., 854 A.2d 1124 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004). “The petition and summary of facts filed pursuant to Practice Book § 32-1, now § 33a-1, alleged the following facts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.