Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 33 — CORPORATIONS · Chapter 601 — Business Corporations
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 33-995 (2025)

Applicability to domestic corporations in existence on January 1, 1997

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 33-600 to 33-998, inclusive, apply to all domestic corporations in existence on January 1, 1997, that were incorporated under any general statute of this state providing for incorporation of corporations with capital stock if power to amend or repeal the statute under which the corporation was incorporated was reserved.

(P.A. 94-186, S. 206, 215; P.A. 96-271, S. 147, 254.)

History: P.A. 94-186 effective January 1, 1997; P.A. 96-271 replaced “corporations for profit” with “corporations with capital stock”, effective January 1, 1997.

Plaintiffs failed to prove either statutory or classical aggrievement and lacked standing to challenge Secretary of the State's certificate of reinstatement and name change of a company that had been dissolved administratively. 105 CA 654.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2016 · leading case: Gillon v. Bysiewicz, 939 A.2d 605 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gillon v. Bysiewicz, 939 A.2d 605 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 4× “, under General Statutes § 33-995 because that authority applies only to corporations that were in existence on January 1, 1997, and that R.”
R.S. Silver Enter., Inc. v. Pascarella, 86 A.3d 471 (Conn. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “ed that the plaintiff is barred from pursuing this action as a matter of public policy because it engaged in bankruptcy fraud when it entered into the contract here at issue; their sixth special defense, in which they challenged the plaintiffs legal capacity to bring the instant…”
R.S. Silver Enter., Inc. v. Pascarella, 134 A.3d 662 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “from pursuing this action as a matter of public policy because it engaged in bankruptcy fraud by enter- ing into the contract here at issue; and their sixth special defense, in which they challenged the plaintiff’s legal capacity to bring the instant action in 2006 on the ground…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.