Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 35-34 (2026)

Injunctive relief

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state or any person, including, but not limited to, a consumer, may sue for injunctive relief, both temporary or permanent, against threatened loss or damage to its property or business by any violation of this chapter. In such actions the court shall follow the rules and principles governing the granting of injunctive relief. If the court issues an injunction, the plaintiff shall recover a reasonable attorney's fee together with costs, as determined by the court.

(1971, P.A. 608, S. 11; P.A. 75-567, S. 7, 80.)

History: P.A. 75-567 substituted “chapter” for “part”.

Cited. 169 C. 344; 177 C. 304; 195 C. 18; 204 C. 17.

Cited. 31 CS 110; 33 CS 221.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2021 · leading case: Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Dep't of Educ., 35 A.3d 188 (Conn. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Dep't of Educ., 35 A.3d 188 (Conn. 2012). · cites it 4× “city, damages under General Statutes § 35-34 for ECI's lost profits and bid preparation costs on the two projects and for the individual plaintiffs' lost wages and benefits, plus treble damages, reasonable attorney's fees and costs under.”

Cheryl Terry Enter., Ltd. v. City of Hartford, 854 A.2d 1066 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 4× “" See also General Statutes § 35-34 ("any person ...”

Doe v. Heintz, 526 A.2d 1318 (Conn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Some examples are antitrust suits by consumers where injunctions are granted; General Statutes § 35-34; claims for trade secret misappropriation that are made in bad faith; General Statutes § 35-54; and actions for damages resulting from unfair trade practices.”

Hatcho Corp. v. Della Pietra, 485 A.2d 1285 (Conn. 1985). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes §§ 35-34 and 35-35. Consequently, the trial court decided these questions adversely to the plaintiffs on evidence sustaining its findings.”

Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc., 417 A.2d 343 (Conn. 1979). · cites it 2× “By comparison, the Connecticut Anti-Trust Act; General Statutes § 35-34; permits private attorneys general to obtain injunctions only in accordance with “the rules and principles governing the granting of injunctive relief.”

Mazzola v. S. New England Tel. Co., 363 A.2d 170 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff brought an action in the Superior Court seeking (1) injunctive relief, under § 35-34 of the General Statutes, against the defendant's continuing termination and interruption of his telephone service, and (2) money damages and attorney's fees and costs, under §…”

Connecticut Ass'n of Clinical Labs. v. Connecticut Blue Cross, Inc., 324 A.2d 288 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1973). · cites it 2× “Under General Statutes § 35-34, which governs actions for injunctive relief under the Connecticut Anti-Trust Act, such proceedings are governed by *113 “the rules and principles governing the granting of injunctive relief.”

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 62 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 1999). “Conn. Gen.Stat. § 35-34. Additionally, Connecticut courts are guided by federal court interpretations of federal antitrust statutes.”

Connecticut State Med. Soc'y v. Connecticut Med. Serv., Inc., 293 A.2d 794 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1971). · cites it 2× “608 (General Statutes § 35-34), proceedings for an injunction under that act are governed by “the rules and principles governing the granting of injunctive relief.”

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Killian, 301 A.2d 562 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1973). “This section (§ 35-38) on “civil penalties” is in addition to § 35-35, allowing treble damages plus counsel fees to the state or to any person injured in its business or property by any violation of the act, and to § 35-34, allowing injunctive relief plus counsel fees.”

Douglas v. Hosp. of St. Raphael, 371 A.2d 396 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1976). “Section 35-34 of the Connecticut Anti-Trust Act, dealing with injunctive relief, treats “threatened loss or damage to its property or business,” and § 35-35 affords a recovery of treble damages to “[t]he state, or any person, including, but not limited to, a consumer, injured in…”

Kent Literary Club of Wesleyan Univ. v. Wesleyan Univ. (Conn. 2021). · cites it 2× “, 12 Connecti- cut Practice Series: Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices, Business Torts and Antitrust (2020–2021 Ed.) § 6.9. Moreover, this court specifically has explained that, to be entitled to injunctive relief under CUTPA, a plaintiff need not establish that no adequate…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.