Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-849 (2025)
(Formerly Sec. 38-286). Rates and premiums to include recoupment of assessments
✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 38a-849 is repealed, effective July 1, 2000.
(1971, P.A. 466, S. 14; P.A. 00-174, S. 82, 83.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: Hunnihan v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co., 705 A.2d 1012 (Conn. 1997).
Hunnihan v. Mattatuck Mfg. Co., 705 A.2d 1012 (Conn. 1997). “The rates and premiums charged by member insurers are authorized by General Statutes § 38a-849 to include amounts sufficient to recoup the assessments levied upon insurers by the association.”
Robinson v. Gailno, 880 A.2d 127 (Conn. 2005). “The rates and premiums charged by member insurers are authorized by General Statutes § 38a-849 to include amounts sufficient to recoup the assessments levied upon insurers by the association.”
Potvin v. Lincoln Serv. & Equip. Co., 6 A.3d 60 (Conn. 2010). “Because [General Statutes] § 38a-849 provides that insurers may pass on the costs of the assessments made against them by the association, it is in reality policyholders who pay for the protections afforded by the association.”
Giglio v. Am. Econ. Ins., 900 A.2d 27 (Conn. 2006). “When an insurer is determined to be insolvent under [General Statutes] § 38a-838 (7), the association becomes obligated pursuant to [General Statutes] § 38a-841, to the extent of covered claims within certain limits.”
Connecticut Ins. Guar. Assn. v. Drown, No. SC18975 (Conn. Oct. 21, 2014). “Because [General Statutes] § 38a-849 provides that insurers may pass on the costs of the assessments made against them by the association, it is in reality policy- holders who pay for the protections afforded by the association.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.