Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-197 (2025)

Action against agency for violation of chapter

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any agency which violates any provision of this chapter shall be subject to an action by any aggrieved person for injunction, declaratory judgment, mandamus or a civil action for damages. Such action may be brought in the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford, or for the judicial district in which the person resides. Actions for injunction, declaratory judgment or mandamus under this section may be prosecuted by any aggrieved person or by the Attorney General in the name of the state upon his own complaint or upon the complaint of any individual. Any aggrieved person who prevails in an action under this section shall be entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. An action under this section shall be privileged with respect to assignment for trial.

(P.A. 76-421, S. 8, 9; 77-431, S. 5, 6; P.A. 78-280, S. 6, 127; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6.)

History: P.A. 77-431 changed effective date of section from July 1, 1977, to January 1, 1978; P.A. 78-280 replaced “Hartford county” with “the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain”; P.A. 88-230 replaced “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” with “judicial district of Hartford”, effective September 1, 1991; P.A. 90-98 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1991, to September 1, 1993; P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14, 1993; P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995.

Cited. 183 C. 85; 186 C. 153.

Secs. 4-198 to 4-204. Reserved for future use.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: Blumenthal v. Barnes, 804 A.2d 152 (Conn. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blumenthal v. Barnes, 804 A.2d 152 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes § 4-197 (attorney general may bring mandamus action in name of state against state agency for violation of any provision of chapter 55 of General Statutes, which concerns confidentiality of personal data); General Statutes § 7-577 (authorizing attorney…”
Hartford Elec. Light Co. v. Tucker, 438 A.2d 828 (Conn. 1981). · cites it 2× “, General Statutes §§4-197, 22a-44, 33-334, 36-407, 36-449, 47a-18, 52-251; 15 U.”
Kennedy v. Caruso, No. 3:19-cv-00260 (D. Conn. Nov. 19, 2021). “Section 4- 197 makes actionable the violation of any provision of the Personal Data Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.