Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 43 — WEIGHTS AND MEASURES · Chapter 750 — Weights and Measures
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 43-2 (2025)

Standards of weights and measures

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The weights and measures received from the United States under a resolution of Congress approved June 14, 1836, and such new weights and measures as are received from the United States as standard weights and measures in addition thereto or in renewal thereof, and such as are supplied by the state in conformity therewith and certified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall be the state standards, by which all municipal standards of weights and measures shall be tried, proved and sealed.

(1949 Rev., S. 6773; 1959, P.A. 152, S. 56; P.A. 90-125, S. 2.)

History: 1959 act deleted reference to county standards; P.A. 90-125 made technical change, substituting National Institute of Standards and Technology for National Bureau of Standards.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1981–2016 · leading case: Bierman v. Westport Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 440 A.2d 882 (Conn. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bierman v. Westport Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 440 A.2d 882 (Conn. 1981). · cites it 7× “” This unlimited pronouncement authorized a frontal attack on the validity of the Westport zoning regulations.”
State v. Robles, 150 A.3d 687 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). “[I]n order for the court to have jurisdiction over a motion to correct an illegal sentence after the sentence has been executed, the sentencing proceeding [itself] .”
State v. Moore, 908 A.2d 568 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “pending final disposition of his or her case upon .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.