Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 43-22 (2026)

Penalty

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person who violates any provision of section 43-20 or 43-21 shall be fined not more than two hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than six months.

(1957, P.A. 585, S. 3.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 224 cases (43 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: State v. McGee, 168 A.3d 495 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. McGee, 168 A.3d 495 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 78× “Practice Book § 43-22 is the embodiment of that common-law exception.”

State v. Lawrence, 913 A.2d 428 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 23× “The defendant, Tarrance Lawrence, appeals, following our grant of certification, 1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22, 2 based on the…”

Cobham v. Comm'r of Corr., 779 A.2d 80 (Conn. 2001). · cites it 15× “We conclude that the petitioner prematurely brought this petition for a writ of habeas corpus, rather than directly appealing the sentence or moving the trial court, pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22, 2 to *32 correct the sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the habeas court’s…”

State v. Parker, 992 A.2d 1103 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 20× “3 In September, 2007, the defendant filed a pro se motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Prac *831 tice Book § 43-22. 4 Pursuant to a request therein, in accordance with this court’s holding in State v.”

State v. Lawrence, 882 A.2d 689 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 36× “The defendant, Tarrance Lawrence, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that it *767 lacked jurisdiction to…”

State v. Taylor, 882 A.2d 682 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 20× “We conclude that the defendant failed to state a claim within the scope of Practice Book § 43-22 1 and therefore that the court had no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the motion.”

State v. Evans, 189 A.3d 1184 (Conn. 2018). · cites it 9× “On November 16, 2011, the defendant pleaded guilty, in accordance with the Alford doctrine, 4 to the sale of narcotics in violation of § 21a-278 (b); the state nolled the possession charge.”

State v. Casiano, 922 A.2d 1065 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 12× “Thereafter, the defendant, acting pro se, filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. 5 In his motion, the defendant alleged that his sentence had been imposed in violation of his state and federal constitutional rights because his plea was…”

Crawford v. Comm'r of Corr., 982 A.2d 620 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 10× “The respondent’s return alleged that the petitioner could not obtain habeas review of the Santobello claim because the petitioner “did not raise this claim in a motion to correct an illegal sentence in accordance with Practice Book § 43-22 20 .... Thus, this claim is…”

State v. Mollo, 776 A.2d 1176 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 14× “The defendant, Arthur Mollo III, appeals from the order of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence, which he filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to…”

State v. Koslik, 977 A.2d 275 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 13× “On September 25, 2007, the defendant, pursuant to Practice Book § 41-8(1), (2), (3) and (9), moved to dismiss the information and filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. Specifically, he argued that violations of § 20-427(b)(3) and (5)…”

State v. Delgado, 151 A.3d 345 (Conn. 2016). · cites it 5× “2 In 2014, the defendant filed a motion to correct his sentence pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22, 3 contending that a prison term that is equivalent to life imprisonment without parole constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the eighth amendment to the United…”

Show all 224 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.