Any person who, by himself or his employee or agent, or as the employee or agent of another, violates any of the provisions of sections
43-31 to
43-33, inclusive, shall (1) for a first offense, be guilty of a class C misdemeanor, and (2) for any subsequent offense, be guilty of a class B misdemeanor.
(1949 Rev., S. 6772; P.A. 12-80, S. 158.)
History: P.A. 12-80 rephrased penalty provisions, changed penalty for first offense from a fine of not less than $20 or more than $200 or imprisonment of not more than 3 months or both to a class C misdemeanor, changed penalty for subsequent offense from a fine of not less than $50 or more than $500 or imprisonment of not more than 1 year or both to a class B misdemeanor and made a technical change.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2005–2021 · leading case:
Vazquez v. Comm'r of Corr., 869 A.2d 234 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005).
Vazquez v. Comm'r of Corr., 869 A.2d 234 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005).
· cites it 5× “Pursuant to Practice Book § 62-9 (d), 6 amotion for leave to withdraw appearance of appointed appellate counsel pursuant to Practice Book § 43-34 7 shall be filed with a brief pursuant to Practice Book § 43-35, 8 and the motion, brief and transcript, if any, shall be referred to…”
Goguen v. Comm'r of Corr., 267 A.3d 831 (Conn. 2021).
“Before the petitioner filed his brief with the Appellate Court, his counsel filed a motion for leave to withdraw as appellate counsel pursuant to Practice Book §§ 43-34 and 62-9 (d), and Anders v.”
State v. Mendez, 197 A.3d 477 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018).
· cites it 2× “Practice Book § 62-9 (d) (1) directs any appointed appellate counsel who concludes, in accordance with Practice Book § 43-34, that an appeal would be wholly frivolous to file under seal with the appellate clerk a motion for leave to withdraw his or her appearance along with a…”
State v. Mendez, No. AC41116 (Conn. App. Ct. Oct. 16, 2018).
“Practice Book § 62-9 (d) (1) directs any appointed appellate counsel who concludes, in accordance with Practice Book § 43-34, that an appeal would be wholly frivolous to file under seal with the appellate clerk a motion for leave to withdraw his or her appearance along with a…”
State v. Cowen, No. AC42450 (Conn. App. Ct. Nov. 9, 2021).
“In light of the court’s finding, which is fully supported by the record, that the state did not make a promise to Crawford in exchange for her testimony, there is no basis for the defendant’s claim that the state improperly relied on the allegedly false testimony of Crawford…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.