Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 43 — WEIGHTS AND MEASURES · Chapter 752 — Weight and Measurement of Specific Articles
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 43-39 (2026)

Delivery tickets. Units of sale

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Each delivery of liquefied petroleum gas on a package basis in tanks, cylinders or containers to consumers and each delivery of liquefied petroleum gas from vehicle tank or other vessel into tanks, cylinders or containers connected to consumer apparatus when sale is based on a quantity so delivered shall be accompanied by a delivery ticket and a duplicate thereof, on which shall be distinctly expressed, in ink or other indelible substance, the net weight or volume of such liquefied petroleum gas delivered together with the name of the seller and the name of the purchaser of such liquefied petroleum gas. One of such tickets shall be surrendered upon demand to the sealer of weights and measures for his inspection. When the sealer desires to retain the customer's ticket, a delivery slip issued by the seller or his agent shall be delivered upon request to the purchaser, or his agent or representative, of such liquefied petroleum gas and the other ticket shall be retained by the seller. The weight of liquefied petroleum gas and the tanks, cylinders or containers into which it is delivered, sold or stored, when sold by weight, shall be expressed in avoirdupois pounds and the weight determined on scales of approved design and sealed by a sealer of weights and measures. Liquefied petroleum gas shall be sold or offered for sale by avoirdupois weight, liquid measure or cubic foot; provided nothing herein shall be interpreted so as to prohibit the sale of liquefied petroleum gas by other units employed prior to October 1, 1951, by industry and accepted by the trade and approved by the Commissioner of Weights and Measures if the meter or scale and the invoice clearly indicate to the consumer the equivalent of such unit in avoirdupois pounds or fractions thereof. All meters and scales employed in the sale or delivery of liquefied petroleum gas shall be of a type approved by said commissioner.

(1951, S. 2885d.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1960–2025 · leading case: State v. Bonner, 964 A.2d 73 (Conn. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Bonner, 964 A.2d 73 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 10× “On October 22, 2004, the defendant filed a motion for a speedy trial pursuant to Practice Book § 43-39 et seq. 2 The court held a hearing on the defendant’s motion on October 27, 2004.”
State v. Cote, 922 A.2d 322 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 8× “On March 8, 2004, the defendant filed a pro se motion for a speedy trial pursuant to General Statutes § 54-82m and Practice Book § 43-39 (d). Thereafter, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Practice Book § 43-41 1 on June 3, 2004.”
State v. Winer, 945 A.2d 430 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 4× “…by statute or rules of practice; see General Statutes §§ 54-82c, 54-82d, 54-82Í and 54-82m; 10 Practice *681 Book §§ 43-39 and 43-40; 11 which provide explicit mandates, § 54-142a (c) does not require that a trial commence within a specific time period to protect a…”
State v. Fernando a., 981 A.2d 427 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 2× “” Practice Book § 43-39 (c) provides for the same right. Of course, the defendant also has federal and state constitutional rights to a speedy trial; see U.”
State v. McCahill, 828 A.2d 1235 (Conn. 2003). · cites it 5× “In accordance with the mandates of § 54-82m, Practice Book §§ 43-39, 43-40 and 43-41 prescribe the manner in which to identify excusable periods of delay.”
Rivers v. City of New Britain, 950 A.2d 1247 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 2× “…within thirty days of the defendant's speedy trial motion was because the defendant's attorney was engaged in a trial in another case. We first looked to the language of § 54-82m, noting that it "requires that the rules adopted by the judges of the Superior Court, `to assure…”
State v. Turner, 751 A.2d 372 (Conn. 2000). · cites it 3× “…of a motion for a speedy trial filed after the expiration of the eight or twelve month time period. Practice Book §§ 43-39 through 43-43, then Practice Book §§ 956B through *745 956F, implement this statutory scheme, 23 with Practice Book § 43-40 creating certain instances…”
State v. Miller, 998 A.2d 170 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 3× “On June 1,2007, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to Practice Book § 41-8 (5), (7) and (9).”
State v. Jeffreys, 828 A.2d 659 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 2× “*669 “General Statutes § 54-82m 8 codifies a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial and confers on the judges of the Superior Court the authority to make such rules as they deem necessary to establish a procedure for implementing that right.”
State v. Williams, 926 A.2d 7 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 2× “See Practice Book § 43-39 et seq. Moscowitz filed a motion for a speedy trial along with numerous other motions on the defendant's behalf.”
State v. Rosario, 984 A.2d 98 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 5× “The statute further provides that the charges against a defendant must be dismissed if that defendant is not brought to trial within thirty days of a motion for a speedy trial filed after the expiration of the eight or twelve month time period, minus excludable time.”
Santana v. City of Hartford, 894 A.2d 307 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes § 54-82m; Practice Book § 43-39. The court also stated: “There may or may not have been strategic reasons underlying the delay.”
Show all 28 citing cases →
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 43-39(c) — 1 case
State v. Fernando a., 981 A.2d 427 (Conn. 2009). “” Practice Book § 43-39 (c) provides for the same right. Of course, the defendant also has federal and state constitutional rights to a speedy trial; see U.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 43-39(d) — 2 cases
Saunders v. Flanagan, 62 F. Supp. 2d 629 (D. Conn. 1999).
Holley v. Middletown Police Dept. (D. Conn. 2021).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.