Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 45a — PROBATE COURTS AND PROCEDURE · Chapter 802h — Protected Persons and Their Property
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-657 (2025)

(Formerly Sec. 45-75b). Court to resolve conflicts between conservators

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
If a person has both a conservator of the person and a conservator of the estate who are not the same person and a conflict arises between the two concerning the duties and responsibilities or authority of either, the matter shall be submitted to the court of probate which appointed the conservators. Upon hearing, the court shall order the course of action which in the court's discretion is in the best interests of the person under conservatorship.

(P.A. 77-446, S. 9; P.A. 80-476, S. 133.)

History: P.A. 80-476 rephrased provisions; Sec. 45-75b transferred to Sec. 45a-657 in 1991.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2016 · leading case: DeNunzio v. DeNunzio, 128 A.3d 901 (Conn. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DeNunzio v. DeNunzio, 128 A.3d 901 (Conn. 2016). · cites it 3× “, General Statutes § 45a-164 (a) (sale or mortgage of real property); General Statutes § 45a-655 (e) (distribution of gifts from estate); General Statutes § 45a-657 (con- flicts between conservators); General Statutes § 45a- 679 (conflicts between guardians and conservators).”
Lesnewski v. Redvers, 886 A.2d 1207 (Conn. 2005). · cites it 2× “This is reflected in the statutory scheme governing conservatorships, which requires the Probate Court to be guided by the conserved person’s best interests in - establishing the conservatorship and selecting the conservator; General Statutes § 45a-650 (e); limiting the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.