Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 47 — LAND AND LAND TITLES · Chapter 828 — Common Interest Ownership Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-200 (2026)

Short title: Common Interest Ownership Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter may be cited as the “Common Interest Ownership Act”.

(P.A. 83-474, S. 1, 96.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 68 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford, Inc., 858 A.2d 860 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford, Inc., 858 A.2d 860 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 4× “On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly held that (1) he could not rely on the Common Interest Ownership Act, General Statutes § 47-200 et seq., (2) the association did not slander the plaintiffs title to his property and (3) the association’s bylaws were…”
Gagne v. Vaccaro, 766 A.2d 416 (Conn. 2001). · cites it 2× “2d 369 (1996) (noting explicit textual differences in Home Improvement Act in concluding that Common Interest Ownership Act; General Statutes § 47-200 et seq.; does not provide unrestricted right of rescission as remedy for violation).”
Willow Springs Condo. Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Dev. Corp., 717 A.2d 77 (Conn. 1998). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 47-200 et seq. The CIOA governs the rights and obligations of parties regarding the financing, construction, organization, sale, and management of common interest communities created on or after January 1, 1984.”
Cantonbury Heights Condo. Ass'n v. Local Land Dev., LLC, 873 A.2d 898 (Conn. 2005). · cites it 2× “This appeal involves the proper inteipretation of a particular clause of the declaration 1 for Cantonbury Heights, a common interest community created pursuant to the Common Interest Ownership Act (act), General Statutes § 47-200 et seq. 2 The plaintiff, Can *727 tonbury Heights…”
Celentano v. Oaks Condo. Ass'n, 830 A.2d 164 (Conn. 2003). · cites it 2× “, which originally was enacted in 1983 and most of which was effective January 1, 1984; specifically to remedy problems arising from unconscionable lease agreements in condominiums and other residential common interest communities created prior to 1984.”
Weldy v. Northbrook Condo. Ass'n, 904 A.2d 188 (Conn. 2006). · cites it 4× “The Appellate Court reversed and remanded the case with direction to render judgment for the plaintiffs, concluding that the twenty foot limitation constituted an improper amendment to the condominium declaration in violation of General Statutes § 47-245 (b) of the Common…”
West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town Council, 636 A.2d 1342 (Conn. 1994). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs proposed affordable housing development will come under the provisions of the Common Interest Ownership Act (CIOA), General Statutes § 47-200 et seq., which provides in relevant part: “ ‘limited equity cooperative’ means a cooperative whose declaration contains…”
Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condo., Inc., 148 A.3d 1123 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “It is uncontested that the condominium in question was created prior to January 1, 1984, and, therefore, generally is governed by the terms of the Condominium Act and not the Common Interest Ownership Act, General Statutes § 47-200 et seq. (Common Interest Ownership Act).”
Elm Street Builders, Inc. v. Enter. Park Condo. Ass'n, 778 A.2d 237 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “The purpose of the declaration was to create a common interest community pursuant to the provisions of General Statutes § 47-200 et seq., the Common Interest Ownership Act.”
Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. P'ship, 662 A.2d 129 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). · cites it 4× “he defendants were in breach and the contract had accordingly been terminated, (2) the contract had been mutually rescinded, (3) the contract violated the statute of frauds because the purchase price and closing date were too indefinite, (4) the defendants breached the implied…”
Alvord Inv., LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 920 A.2d 1000 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 2× “The principal issue in this zoning appeal is whether the Common Interest Ownership Act (act), General Statutes § 47-200 et seq., allows for the creation of a common interest community comprised solely of airspace units.”
Harley v. Indian Spring Land Co., 3 A.3d 992 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “; as well as the Common Interest Ownership Act (CIOA); General Statutes § 47-200 et seq. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court, for several reasons, improperly concluded that there was a valid oral modification to the reservation agreement.”
Show all 68 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.