(a) For purposes of the Social Security Agreement, the retirement system shall be divided into two parts, known as part A and part B. Part A shall consist of the positions of state employees, other than state police, who are members but who are not covered under Social Security. Part B shall consist of the positions of state employees who are members and who are covered under Social Security, in accordance with the Social Security Agreement.
(b) All state employees other than state police becoming members on and after October 1, 1961, shall be included under part B.
(c) The position of any part A member may, at his request, be transferred to part B, to the extent and in the manner permitted by Section 218 of the Social Security Act.
(d) The state police and employees of state-aided institutions are not covered under the Social Security Agreement and are not included under either part A or part B except as provided in section 5-158e.
(1957, P.A. 595, S. 2; September, 1957, P.A. 9, S. 1; 1958 Rev., S. 5-96; 1959, P.A. 131, S. 2; 1961, P.A. 234, S. 6; P.A. 80-407, S. 1, 4.)
History: 1959 act added Subsec. (c); 1961 act “restated” state employees retirement act “in a simpler, clearer and more orderly form”; P.A. 80-407 amended Subsec. (d) modifying exclusion of state police and employees of state-aided institutions by providing exception in accordance with Sec. 5-158e.
Notes of Decisions
Pineman v. Oechslin, 494 F. Supp. 525 (D. Conn. 1980).
· cites it 2× “See Conn.Gen.Stat. §§ 5-157, 5-158a-g. Under either plan, the employees are required to make contributions to the State Employees Retirement Fund, out of which the members’ retirement benefits are paid.”
LoPresto v. State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 662 A.2d 738 (Conn. 1995).
· cites it 2× “The tier I retirement plan, set forth at General Statutes §§ 5-157 through 5-192d, applies to former state employees who, like the *431 plaintiff, joined the state retirement system prior to July 1,1984.”
Crandle v. Connecticut State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 342 Conn. 67 (2022).
· cites it 2× “htm (last visited January 31, 2022) 8 The commission attached to its ruling an exhibit that is identified in the index to the return of record that was filed in the trial court as a ‘‘selection of the commission’s past decisions relating to the effective date of payment of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.