(a) Each “hazardous duty member” who has completed twenty-five years of credited service while a hazardous duty member may be retired on his own application on the first day of any future month named in the application. For this purpose, leaves of absence, military service, and any other period of nonstate employment which is included as credited service shall be deemed credited service while a hazardous duty member only if state employment as a hazardous duty member immediately precedes and immediately succeeds such period of nonstate employment.
(b) Each member referred to in subsection (a) of this section shall receive a monthly retirement income beginning on his retirement date equal to the greater of one-twelfth of two per cent of his final average earnings multiplied by his years of credited service whether while a hazardous duty member or otherwise or (1) if retirement occurs before July 1, 1983, $200; (2) if retirement occurs on or after July 1, 1983, and on or before June 30, 1984, $220; (3) if retirement occurs on or after July 1, 1984, and on or before June 30, 1985, $240; (4) if retirement occurs on or after July 1, 1985, and on or before June 30, 1986, $260; (5) if retirement occurs on or after July 1, 1986, and on or before June 30, 1987, $280; (6) if on or after July 1, 1987, $300.
(P.A. 83-533, S. 30, 54.)
Cited. 234 C. 424.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2022 · leading case:
Mickey v. Mickey, 974 A.2d 641 (Conn. 2009).
Mickey v. Mickey, 974 A.2d 641 (Conn. 2009).
· cites it 20× “See General Statutes § 5-192e et seq. Due to the nature of his job, the defendant potentially was eligible for hazardous duty retirement under General Statutes § 5-192n, [4] and, as with all other state employees enrolled in tier II, also was eligible for normal retirement…”
Travelers Ins. v. Pondi-Salik, 817 A.2d 663 (Conn. 2003).
· cites it 2× “Additionally, the statutes surrounding § 5-192p provide for various types of retirement benefits: General Statutes § 5-192n provides for hazardous duty retirement; General Statutes § 5-192o provides for deferred vested retirement; General Statutes § 5-192q provides for optional…”
Crandle v. Connecticut State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 342 Conn. 67 (2022).
· cites it 2× “‘‘(b) Each member referred to in subsection (a) of this section shall receive a monthly retirement income beginning on his retirement date . . . .’’ 30 The plaintiffs suggest that the fact that the provisions governing disability retirement, unlike the provisions governing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.