Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 5-202 (2026)

Individual and group appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Any employee who is not included in any collective bargaining unit of state employees and who has achieved a permanent appointment as defined in section 5-196 may appeal to the Employees' Review Board if such employee receives an unsatisfactory performance evaluation or is demoted, suspended or dismissed, or is aggrieved as a result of (1) alleged unlawful discrimination, unless a complaint is or has been filed by such employee with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, (2) unsafe or unhealthy working conditions, unless a complaint is or has been filed by such employee with the state or federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or (3) violations involving the interpretation and application of a specific state personnel statute, regulation or rule. Such employee must have complied with preliminary review procedures, except as otherwise provided in subsection (l) of this section. Such an appeal shall be submitted to the board not later than thirty days from the completion of the final level of the preliminary review procedure, provided the first level of the procedure shall have been initiated no later than thirty calendar days from the date of the alleged violation, except that in cases of dismissal, demotion or suspension the grievance must be submitted directly to the third level of the procedure and shall have been initiated no later than thirty calendar days from the effective date of such action.

(b) Any group of employees that is not included in any collective bargaining unit of state employees may file an appeal as a group directly with the Employees' Review Board if such group of employees is laid off or dismissed, or is aggrieved as a result of alleged unlawful discrimination, unless a complaint is or has been filed by such group of employees with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities or the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, or unsafe or unhealthy working conditions, unless a complaint is or has been filed by such group of employees with the state or federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or violations involving the interpretation and application of a specific state personnel statute, regulation or rule, provided each member of such group (1) is appealing the same or a similar issue, as determined by the Employees' Review Board, (2) is a permanent employee, as defined in section 5-196, and (3) has achieved a permanent appointment, as defined in section 5-196. Such an appeal shall be submitted to the board not later than thirty calendar days from the specific incident or effective date of action giving rise to such appeal.

(c) Upon receiving an appeal, the board shall assign a time and place for a hearing and shall give notice of such time and place to the parties concerned. The hearing panel shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence prevailing in the courts. If, after hearing, a majority of the hearing panel determines that the action appealed from was arbitrary or taken without reasonable cause, the appeal shall be sustained; otherwise, the appeal shall be denied. The hearing panel shall have the power to direct appropriate remedial action and shall do so after taking into consideration just and equitable relief to the employee or group of employees and the best interests and effectiveness of the state service. The hearing panel shall render a decision not later than sixty calendar days from the date of the conclusion of the hearing.

(d) The employee or group of employees in any such case shall be furnished, upon request, with a copy of the transcript of the proceedings before the board. The chairman of the board shall establish a fair and reasonable fee per page to be charged for such transcript which fee shall not exceed the fee per page for a transcript charged by court reporters for the judicial district of Hartford. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, such fee shall not be waived for any party.

(e) Not later than ten days from the issuance date of a decision by a hearing panel sustaining an appeal, the appointing authority of the employee shall take such measures as are necessary to comply with the remedial action directed by the hearing panel.

(f) An employee or group of employees laid off or dismissed by reason of economy, lack of work, insufficient appropriation, change in departmental organization or abolition of position may file an appeal with the board only on the grounds that the order of layoff or dismissal has not been determined in accordance with the provisions of section 5-241, provided (1) such employee has initiated the third level of the preliminary review procedure not later than thirty calendar days from the effective date of such layoff or dismissal, or (2) such group of employees submits such appeal to the board not later than thirty calendar days from the effective date of the layoff or dismissal.

(g) All matters involving examination, including application rejection, type of examination or results, compensation for class or classes, establishment of a new class or classes, classification of a position, occupational group or career progression level, compliance with health and safety standards and the Connecticut Occupational Safety and Health Act or alleged discrimination in cases where an appeal has been filed with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, shall not be appealable under this section.

(h) The first level of the preliminary review procedure preparatory to the filing of an appeal from an alleged grievable action under subsection (a) of this section other than dismissal, demotion or suspension shall be the aggrieved employee's supervisor or department chief or other employee as designated by the employee's appointing authority. Such aggrieved employee shall present the employee's grievance in writing on a form developed by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management and the Employee Review Board which form shall contain a statement of the date the alleged violation occurred and the relief sought in answer to the grievance. The first level designee shall give said designee's answer to such employee not later than seven calendar days from the date the grievance is submitted to said designee or not later than seven days from the date of a meeting convened for the purpose of reviewing the grievance, in which case such meeting shall be convened not later than seven calendar days from the date the grievance is submitted.

(i) The second level of the preliminary review procedure preparatory to the filing of an appeal from an alleged grievable action under subsection (a) of this section other than dismissal, demotion or suspension shall be the aggrieved employee's appointing authority or designated representative. Such employee, upon receiving a response at the first level which the employee deems to be unsatisfactory, may proceed to this level by presenting the same form containing the first level answers not later than seven calendar days from the date the answer was given at the first level. The appointing authority or designated representative shall answer such employee not later than seven calendar days from the date the grievance is received or not later than seven calendar days from the date of a meeting convened for the purpose of reviewing such grievance, in which case such meeting shall be convened not later than seven calendar days from the date such grievance is received.

(j) The third level of the preliminary review procedure preparatory to the filing of an appeal from an alleged grievable action under subsection (a) of this section including dismissal, demotion or suspension shall be the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management or the secretary's designated representative. The employee, upon receiving a response at the second level which the employee deems to be unsatisfactory, may proceed to this level by presenting the same form containing the first and second level answers not later than seven calendar days from the date the answer was given at the second level, except in the case of a dismissal, demotion or suspension in which case such employee must present the form, completed but without answers at lower levels not later than thirty calendar days from the effective date of such action. The Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management or the secretary's designated representative shall reply to such employee not later than thirty calendar days from the date such grievance is received or not later than fifteen calendar days from the date of a meeting convened for the purpose of reviewing such grievance, in which case such meeting shall be convened not later than thirty calendar days from the date such grievance is received.

(k) Employees shall be entitled to have representation of their own choosing at any or all levels of the review or appeal procedure. No verbatim records shall be required in the preliminary procedure and no oaths or affirmations shall be administered.

(l) Any state officer or employee, as defined in section 4-141, or any appointing authority shall not take or threaten to take any personnel action against any state employee or group of state employees in retaliation for the filing of an appeal with the Employees' Review Board or a grievance with any level of the preliminary review procedure pursuant to this section. An employee or group of employees alleging that such action has been threatened or taken may file an appeal directly with the board not later than thirty days from knowledge of the specific incident giving rise to such claim.

(m) Either the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management or any employee or group of employees aggrieved by a decision of the Employees' Review Board may appeal from such decision in accordance with section 4-183. The board may intervene as a party in any appeal of its decision. Any employee or group of employees who prevails in a decision of the Employees' Review Board shall be entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorney's fees if such decision is appealed by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management and affirmed by the court in such appeal.

(n) Any time limit set forth in this section may be waived by mutual written agreement of the employee or group of employees, or the designated representative of the employee or group of employees, and the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management or the secretary's designee.

(1967, P.A. 657, S. 11; 1969, P.A. 658, S. 1, 2; 1971, P.A. 98; P.A. 77-614, S. 66, 67, 610; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 5, 6, 127; P.A. 79-621, S. 7, 24; P.A. 80-57, S. 3; P.A. 86-51; P.A. 87-456, S. 2, 6; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 92-165, S. 6, 32; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 94-194; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1, S. 43, 121; P.A. 00-77, S. 3–5, 7; P.A. 04-118, S. 1; P.A. 13-247, S. 347.)

History: 1969 act amended Subsec. (a) by adding proviso that preliminary grievance procedures be initiated within 30 days of grievance occurrence and repealed Subsec. (g); 1971 act added new Subsec. (d) re transcripts and relettered remaining Subsecs. accordingly; P.A. 77-614 replaced personnel commissioner and personnel policy board with commissioner of administrative services; P.A. 78-280 replaced Hartford county with judicial district of Hartford-New Britain; P.A. 79-621 extensively revised appeal and preliminary procedures, providing for appeal to employees' review board rather than personnel appeal board, omitting Subsec. (b) and relettering remaining Subsecs. accordingly and adding new Subsecs. (g) to (j), inclusive; P.A. 80-57 changed times for initiating third level of procedure in Subsec. (e) and for presenting completed form in Subsec. (i) from 10 to 21 days in both cases; P.A. 86-51 added Subsec. (k), protecting state employees and officers against retaliatory personnel action due to their filing of an appeal or grievance under this section; P.A. 87-456 amended Subsec. (a) to allow appeals to the board by an employee who receives an unsatisfactory performance evaluation, and added Subsec. (l) allowing aggrieved parties to appeal in accordance with Sec. 4-183 and providing for the recovery of court costs and attorney's fees; P.A. 88-230 replaced “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” with “judicial district of Hartford”, effective September 1, 1991; P.A. 90-98 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1991, to September 1, 1993; P.A. 92-165 added “occupational group or career progression level” to Subsec. (f); P.A. 93-142 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1993, to September 1, 1996, effective June 14, 1993; P.A. 94-194 in Subsec. (a) added a reference to “rule”, to indicate a specific application to a statute or regulation, changed from “ten” to “thirty” the number of days of the completion of the final level of the preliminary review procedure, increased from “twenty-one” to “thirty” the times for initiating third level of procedure in Subsec. (e) and for presenting completed form in Subsec. (i), in Subsec. (f) made a reference to “classification of a position”, made a reference in Subsec. (l) to the “commissioner of administrative services” in lieu of “the state”, and allowed the board to intervene as a party in any appeal of its decisions (Revisor's note: An obsolete reference in Subsec. (f) to “Human Rights Commission” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities”); P.A. 95-220 changed the effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 98-1 made a technical change in Subsec. (a) by correcting a statutory reference, effective June 24, 1998; P.A. 00-77 amended Subsecs. (g), (i) and (l) by substituting the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management for the Commissioner of Administrative Services and made technical changes in Subsecs. (g) and (i), effective May 16, 2000; P.A. 04-118 added new Subsec. (b) to allow group appeals by certain nonunionized state employees aggrieved by same or similar issue, redesignated existing Subsecs. (b) to (l), inclusive, as Subsecs. (c) to (m), inclusive, amended Subsecs. (c), (d), (f), (l) and (m) to make procedures for group appeals consistent with procedures for individual appeals and made technical changes throughout; P.A. 13-247 amended Subsecs. (a) and (b) to replace “alleged discrimination” with “alleged unlawful discrimination” and to disallow an appeal if complaint has been filed with Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or state or federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, amended Subsec. (d) to add provision re fee not to be waived for any party, added Subsec. (n) re waiver of time limit, and made technical changes, effective July 1, 2013.

Cited. 176 C. 1; 202 C. 670; 231 C. 391; 240 C. 246.

Cited. 31 CS 186; 36 CS 297.

Subsec. (a):

Cited. 170 C. 541; 186 C. 198. Disparate treatment of managerial employees and employees subject to collective bargaining is not a form of discrimination within review board's jurisdiction under section. 226 C. 670.

Subsec. (c):

State employee cannot be dismissed arbitrarily or without reasonable cause. 170 C. 668. Order conditioning reinstatement on physician's favorable report determined to be “appropriate remedial action”. 174 C. 519.

Hearing panel's decision not invalid because untimely. 30 CS 333. Cited. 35 CS 45.

Subsec. (f):

P.A. 94-194 clarified existing law and necessarily has retroactive effect. 239 C. 638.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: State v. State Employees' Review Bd., 687 A.2d 134 (Conn. 1997).
State v. State Employees' Review Bd., 687 A.2d 134 (Conn. 1997). · cites it 36× “* ** * “The present statute, CGS § 5-202 (f), exempts from Board jurisdiction ‘matters involving .”
Chotkowski v. State, 690 A.2d 368 (Conn. 1997). · cites it 16× “2d 868 (1978) (Chotkowski I) (affirming trial court holding that plaintiff was permanent employee in classified state service for purposes of General Statutes § 5-202 [a]; subsequently, parties agreed to settlement of plaintiffs termination claim); Special Acts 1985, No.”
Dep't of Admin. Servs. v. Employees' Review Bd., 628 A.2d 957 (Conn. 1993). · cites it 25× “The plaintiffs appealed to the trial court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 5-202 (l) and 4-183 (a).”
State v. State Employees' Review Bd., 650 A.2d 158 (Conn. 1994). · cites it 18× “Cawley appealed to the review board pursuant to General Statutes § 5-202, 7 seeking a determination as *396 to whether his layoff was in accordance with General *397 Statutes § 5-241, 8 which requires layoffs by seniority within a position classification selected for layoff.”
Farricielli v. Connecticut Pers. Appeal Bd., 440 A.2d 286 (Conn. 1982). · cites it 4× “The plaintiff appealed this dismissal to the Connecticut personnel appeal board (the board) on March 31, 1977, pursuant to General Statutes § 5-202 (a). The board dismissed the plaintiff's appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on May 25, 1977.”
Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985). “1984) (hearing within 45 days, decision within 45 days of hearing); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 5-202 (b) (Supp. 1984) (decision within 60 days of hearing); Ill.”
Chotkowski v. Connecticut Pers. Appeal Bd., 404 A.2d 868 (Conn. 1978). · cites it 8× “The plaintiff then appealed to the board under General Statutes § 5-202 (a), 1 which grants a right of appeal to any “permanent employee holding a position in the classified service” who is dismissed.”
Nagy v. Employees' Review Bd., 735 A.2d 297 (Conn. 1999). · cites it 8× “5 Thereafter, pursuant to General Statutes § 5-202, 6 the plaintiffs appealed from the commissioner’s order to the named defendant, the employees’ review board (board), 7 claiming that §§ 5-247 and 5-250, the statutory provisions that address their rights to sick and vacation…”
Millard v. Connecticut Pers. Appeal Bd., 368 A.2d 121 (Conn. 1976). · cites it 6× “*543 Section 5-201 of the General Statutes provides for the appointment of a personnel appeal board consisting of nine members whose duty it is to hear and act upon appeals filed in accordance with General Statutes § 5-202 (a) by aggrieved state employees.”
In re Joshua S., 796 A.2d 1141 (Conn. 2002). “Hemond, chief attorney for the Connecticut law revision commission, provided testimony on behalf of the commission expressing its support of the revision of § 45a-596 to allow appointment of a guardian by a nontestamentary instrument, stating that “[ajllowing appointment in a…”
Wagner v. Connecticut Pers. Appeal Bd., 368 A.2d 20 (Conn. 1976). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes § 5-202 (c). 2 It is evident that if $ 5-162 (c) (1) were construed as allowing the arbitrary and selective forced retirement of state employees based upon no factors other than age or length of service, it could not be reconciled with the statutory scheme…”
Gervasoni v. McGrath, 418 A.2d 952 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1980). · cites it 2× “She subsequently filed an appeal with the defendant personnel appeal board, pursuant to General Statutes § 5-202. On June 22,1977, the board sustained her discharge and denied the appeal.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 5-202(a) — 1 case
Zinker v. Doty, 637 F. Supp. 138 (D. Conn. 1986).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.