Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-264 (2026)
Judges of Supreme Court to make rules for appeals and writs of error
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The judges of the Supreme Court shall make such orders and rules as they deem necessary concerning the practice and procedure in the taking of appeals and writs of error, and concerning the giving of security by the appealing party, the stay of execution during the pendency of appeal, the payment of costs and the taxation of reasonable costs when the same have not been fixed by statute.
(1949 Rev., S. 8012; 1957, P.A. 651, S. 32; P.A. 82-160, S. 136; P.A. 19-64, S. 18.)
History: P.A. 82-160 made a technical correction; P.A. 19-64 deleted “to the Supreme Court”, effective September 1, 2019.
Cited. 111 C. 75; 122 C. 464; 123 C. 655; 135 C. 267; Id., 412; 159 C. 481.
Cited. 15 CS 273.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1969–2017 · leading case: State v. Reid, 894 A.2d 963 (Conn. 2006).
State v. Reid, 894 A.2d 963 (Conn. 2006). “Subject to the provisions of subsection (b), such rules shall become effective on such date as the judges specify but not in any event until sixty days after such promulgation.”
Tomick v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 153 A.3d 615 (Conn. 2016). “In Ames , a plaintiff sought **480 damages for the unlawful repossession of a vehicle under General Statutes § 52-264, as well as attorney's fees under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.”
Thomas v. Thomas, 271 A.2d 62 (Conn. 1970). “The taking of an appeal from a separation decree stays enforcement of rights derived from that judgment by the litigants, and it is an abuse of discretion for a court to render a decree under §46-30 until the validity of that judgment of legal separation has *481 been finally…”
LaReau v. Reincke, 264 A.2d 576 (Conn. 1969). “See also General Statutes § 52-264, which provides: “The judges of the supreme court shall make such orders and rules as they deem necessary concerning the practice and procedure in the taking of appeals and writs of error to the supreme court .”
Tomick v. United Parcel Serv., Inc. (Conn. 2017). “In Ames, a plaintiff sought damages for the unlawful repossession of a vehicle under General Statutes § 52-264, as well as attorney’s fees under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.