Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-325d (2026)
Motion for discharge of invalid notice of lis pendens
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In any action in which (1) a notice of lis pendens was recorded which is not intended to affect real property, or (2) the recorded notice does not contain the information required by subsection (a) of section 52-325 or section 46b-80, as the case may be, or (3) service of process or service of the certified copy of the notice of lis pendens was not made in accordance with statutory requirements, or (4) when, for any other reason, the recorded notice of lis pendens never became effective or has become of no effect, any interested party may file a motion requesting the court to discharge the recorded notice of lis pendens. If the court finds that such notice never became effective or has become of no effect, it shall issue its order declaring that such notice of lis pendens is invalid and discharged, and that the same does not constitute constructive notice. A certified copy of such order may be recorded in the land records of the town in which the notice of lis pendens was recorded.
(P.A. 81-8, S. 6, 9.)
Cited. 189 C. 471; 209 C. 15; 217 C. 24.
Cited. 39 CS 195. Effect of notice of lis pendens distinguished from effect of prejudgment attachment; constitutionality discussed. 42 CS 241.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Dunham v. Dunham, 584 A.2d 445 (Conn. 1991).
Dunham v. Dunham, 584 A.2d 445 (Conn. 1991). “When, however, a property owner files a motion for discharge alleging an invalid notice of lis pendens, resolution of this motion is governed in its entirety by General Statutes § 52-325d.* ***** 7 Section 52-325d provides relief *39 if the recorded notice of lis pendens: “(1) .”
Stratton v. Ward, 474 A.2d 113 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1983). “Subsequently, the defendant Ward filed with the court a motion for discharge of invalid notice of lis pen- *196 dens, as provided by General Statutes § 52-325d, alleging that the lis pendens is not intended to affect real property.”
Levinson v. Lawrence (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). “‘‘When, however, a property owner files a motion for discharge alleging an invalid notice of lis pendens, resolution of this motion is governed in its entirety by General Statutes § 52-325d. Section 52-325d provides relief if the recorded notice of lis pendens: ‘(1) .”
Fairlake Capital, LLC v. Lathouris (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). “2d 445 (1991) (concluding that orders entered pursuant to General Statutes § 52-325d,2 in con- trast to orders entered pursuant to § 52-325b, are not final judgments), overruled on other grounds by Santo- pietro v.”
Fairlake Capital, LLC v. Lathouris (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). “When, however, a property owner files a motion for discharge alleging an invalid notice of lis pendens, resolution of this motion is gov- erned in its entirety by General Statutes § 52-325d.’’ (Footnote omitted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.