Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-400d (2025)

Appeal of certain court decisions

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Any court decision on a determination of interest in property under section 52-356c, or on an exemption claim, or on a contempt proceeding, or on any stay ordered pursuant to an installment payment order, shall be a final decision for the purpose of appeal.

(b) An appeal under subsection (a) of this section shall not act as a stay unless so ordered by the court. Any such stay shall be granted if the party taking the appeal posts a bond, with surety, in a sum determined by the court to be sufficient to indemnify the adverse party for any damages which may accrue as a result of such stay or if otherwise deemed reasonable.

(P.A. 83-581, S. 27, 40.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2013–2017 · leading case: Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford Hosp., 157 A.3d 1125 (Conn. 2017).
Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford Hosp., 157 A.3d 1125 (Conn. 2017). · cites it 4× “) We assume without deciding that: (1) the contempt proceedings encompassed by § 52-400d are limited to those expressly authorized in chapter 906; see, e.”
N.D.R. Liuzzi, Inc. v. Lighthouse Litho, LLC, 75 A.3d 694 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 8× “The plaintiffs claim that the contempt finding was a final judgment for purposes of appeal under General Statutes § 52-400d (a). 3 We agree with the defendant and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal insofar as it relates to the contempt finding.”
Great Country Bank v. Ogalin, 148 A.3d 218 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “" General Statutes § 52-400d ; see, e.g., PB Real Estate, Inc.”
Olszewski v. Jordan, 71 A.3d 1276 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes § 52-400d (a) (“[a]ny court decision on a determination of interest in property under section 52-356c .”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-400d(a): 1 case
Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford Hosp., 157 A.3d 1125 (Conn. 2017). “) We assume without deciding that: (1) the contempt proceedings encompassed by § 52-400d are limited to those expressly authorized in chapter 906; see, e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.