Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-557e (2025)

Immunity of physicians from liability for uncompensated service on hospital utilization review committee

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No action may be brought to recover damages against any licensed physician for any decision or action taken by him as a member of a hospital utilization review committee on which he serves without compensation and to which he shall have been appointed by the staff of the hospital, the function of which committee, as directed by the federal Medicare Act, as amended, shall have been to review the utilization of the facilities of the hospital in the interests of efficiency and the quality of service to the public.

(1971, P.A. 157; P.A. 82-160, S. 226.)

History: P.A. 82-160 made minor changes in wording.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2023 · leading case: Trinity Christian Sch. v. Comm'n on Human Rights, 189 A.3d 79 (Conn. 2018).
Trinity Christian Sch. v. Comm'n on Human Rights, 189 A.3d 79 (Conn. 2018). · cites it 2× “, General Statutes § 52-557e ("[n]o action may be brought to recover damages against any licensed physician for any decision or action taken by him as a member of a hospital utilization review committee").”
Smith v. Supple, 293 A.3d 851 (Conn. 2023). · cites it 2× “; see General Statutes § 52-557e (‘‘[n]o action may be brought to recover damages against any licensed physician for any decision or action taken by him as a member of a hospital utilization review committee’’); General Statutes § 52-557o (‘‘[n]o action for trespass shall…”
Smith v. Supple, 293 A.3d 851 (Conn. 2023). · cites it 2× “; see General Statutes § 52-557e (‘‘[n]o action may be brought to recover damages against any licensed physician for any decision or action taken by him as a member of a hospital utilization review committee’’); General Statutes § 52-557o (‘‘[n]o action for trespass shall…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.