Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-16a (2025)

Affirmative defense in certain situations involving firearms; exceptions

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In any prosecution for an offense under section 53a-55a, 53a-56a, 53a-60a, 53a-92a, 53a-94a, 53a-102a or 53a-103a, it shall be an affirmative defense that the pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or other firearm was not a weapon from which a shot could be discharged, but it shall not be an affirmative defense to any prosecution under section 53a-55, 53a-56, 53a-60, 53a-92, 53a-94, 53a-102 or 53a-103.

(P.A. 75-380, S. 2; P.A. 81-27, S. 4; P.A. 92-260, S. 1.)

History: P.A. 81-27 removed references to prosecutions under repealed sections 53a-72, 53a-75 and 53a-78; P.A. 92-260 made technical changes.

Defendant is entitled to a theory of defense instruction as a matter of law when evidence under section is before jury. 178 C. 704. Cited. 198 C. 190; 209 C. 75.

Cited. 23 CA 615; 24 CA 195; 45 CA 390.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1979–2012 · leading case: State v. Darryl W., 33 A.3d 239 (Conn. 2012).
State v. Darryl W., 33 A.3d 239 (Conn. 2012). · cites it 18× “He claims first that the trial court improperly instructed the jury regarding the elements of §§ 53a-70a (a) (1) and 53a-92a and regarding his affirmative defense to § 53a-92a under General Statutes § 53a-16a. 4 This claim specifically concerns the legal standards for *357…”
State v. Woods, 583 A.2d 639 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990). · cites it 2× “The common law defense of necessity, preserved under a savings statute, General Statutes § 53a-4, is available to the same extent as the statutorily defined defenses of Chapter 951, particularly the affirmative defenses of justification in General Statutes §§ 53a-16a through…”
State v. Rosado, 425 A.2d 108 (Conn. 1979). “…§ 53a-14; entrapment; § 53a-15; justification; § 53a-16, as defined in §§ 53a-17 through 53a-23; use of firearms; §§ 53a-16a and 53a-16b; and renunciation of criminal purpose in a conspiracy charge; § 53a-48. We hold .therefore that only when evidence indicating the…”
State v. Messler, 562 A.2d 1138 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989). “…duress; § 53a-15, entrapment; § 53a-16, justification, as defined in General Statutes §§ 53a-17 through 53a-23; §§ 53a-16a and 53a-16b, use of firearms; and § 53a-48, renunciation of criminal purpose in a conspiracy charge. The Rosada court held that “only when evidence…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.