In any prosecution for an offense under section
53a-55a,
53a-56a,
53a-60a,
53a-92a,
53a-94a,
53a-102a or
53a-103a, it shall be an affirmative defense that the pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or other firearm was not a weapon from which a shot could be discharged, but it shall not be an affirmative defense to any prosecution under section
53a-55,
53a-56,
53a-60,
53a-92,
53a-94,
53a-102 or
53a-103.
(P.A. 75-380, S. 2; P.A. 81-27, S. 4; P.A. 92-260, S. 1.)
History: P.A. 81-27 removed references to prosecutions under repealed sections 53a-72, 53a-75 and 53a-78; P.A. 92-260 made technical changes.
Defendant is entitled to a theory of defense instruction as a matter of law when evidence under section is before jury. 178 C. 704. Cited. 198 C. 190; 209 C. 75.
Cited. 23 CA 615; 24 CA 195; 45 CA 390.
Notes of Decisions
State v. Darryl W., 33 A.3d 239 (Conn. 2012).
· cites it 18× “He claims first that the trial court improperly instructed the jury regarding the elements of §§ 53a-70a (a) (1) and 53a-92a and regarding his affirmative defense to § 53a-92a under General Statutes § 53a-16a. 4 This claim specifically concerns the legal standards for *357…”
State v. Woods, 583 A.2d 639 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990).
· cites it 2× “The common law defense of necessity, preserved under a savings statute, General Statutes § 53a-4, is available to the same extent as the statutorily defined defenses of Chapter 951, particularly the affirmative defenses of justification in General Statutes §§ 53a-16a through…”
State v. Rosado, 425 A.2d 108 (Conn. 1979).
“…§ 53a-14; entrapment; § 53a-15; justification; § 53a-16, as defined in §§ 53a-17 through 53a-23; use of firearms; §§ 53a-16a and 53a-16b; and renunciation of criminal purpose in a conspiracy charge; § 53a-48. We hold .therefore that only when evidence indicating the…”
State v. Messler, 562 A.2d 1138 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989).
“…duress; § 53a-15, entrapment; § 53a-16, justification, as defined in General Statutes §§ 53a-17 through 53a-23; §§ 53a-16a and 53a-16b, use of firearms; and § 53a-48, renunciation of criminal purpose in a conspiracy charge. The Rosada court held that “only when evidence…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.