Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-153 (2025)

Where witnesses for accused paid by state

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The court before which any criminal prosecution is pending may order such number of witnesses as the court approves to be summoned on behalf of the accused at the expense of the state.

(1949 Rev., S. 8852.)

Cited. 17 CA 359.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1989–2014 · leading case: State v. Erhardt, 553 A.2d 188 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989).
State v. Erhardt, 553 A.2d 188 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989). · cites it 4× “The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in denying his request to compel a codefendant to answer “non-self-incriminating” questions, in violation of his right under the Connecticut constitution and General Statutes § 54-153 to compulsory process, and (2) in excluding…”
State v. Wang, 92 A.3d 220 (Conn. 2014). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes § 54-144 (payment of court approved expenses necessarily incurred in criminal proceedings or prosecutions); General Statutes § 54- 150 (physician compensation in criminal cases); General Statutes § 54-151 (transcript and printing costs for indigent…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.