Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-41n (2025)
Report by panel to Chief Court Administrator
✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In addition to any reports required by federal law, within thirty days next succeeding the expiration of an order or an extension thereof, or the denial of an application, the panel shall report to the Chief Court Administrator the fact that an order or extension was applied for; the fact that the order or extension was granted as applied for, was modified or was denied; the period of interceptions authorized by the order, and the number and duration of any extensions of the order; the offense or offenses specified in the order or application, or extension of an order; the identity of the person making the application and the nature of the facilities from which or the place where communications were to be intercepted.
(1971, P.A. 68, S. 14; P.A. 76-436, S. 10a, 534, 681; P.A. 99-215, S. 16.)
History: P.A. 76-436 made no change, Sec. 10a of the act cancelling amendment called for in Sec. 534; P.A. 99-215 deleted “issuing or denying” before “panel”.
Cited. 191 C. 360; 212 C. 485; 238 C. 692.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1983–1983 · leading case: State v. Thompson, 464 A.2d 799 (Conn. 1983).
State v. Thompson, 464 A.2d 799 (Conn. 1983). “) In addition to the order itself, the panel is required to prepare a statement pursuant to General Statutes § 54-41e; see footnote 5, supra; and a report to be submitted to the chief court administrator.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.