The state's attorney in the judicial district in which any forfeiture to the state accrues shall collect and pay it to the State Treasurer; and, if in the opinion of the court the plaintiff is an improper person to collect it, a separate execution may be issued in favor of the state.
(1949 Rev., S. 8773; 1959, P.A. 152, S. 81; P.A. 73-116, S. 5; 73-667, S. 1, 2; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 127.)
History: 1959 act deleted provision for forfeiture to county, county government having been abolished; P.A. 73-116 added reference to judicial districts; P.A. 73-667 changed effective date of P.A. 73-116 from October 1, 1973, to April 25, 1973; P.A. 78-280 deleted reference to counties.
Cited. 222 C. 331.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1
case, 2007–2007 · leading case:
State v. Bell, 931 A.2d 198 (Conn. 2007).
State v. Bell, 931 A.2d 198 (Conn. 2007).
· cites it 2× “ersistent offender of crimes involving assault, stalking, trespass, threatening, harassment or criminal violation of protective order or restraining order); General Statutes § 53a-40e (standing criminal restraining order); General Statutes § 53a-40f (persistent offender while…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.