Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 54 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · Chapter 961 — Trial and Proceedings after Conviction
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-84b (2025)

Testimony of spouse re confidential communications

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) For the purposes of this section, “confidential communication” means any oral or written communication made between spouses during a marriage that is intended to be confidential and is induced by the affection, confidence, loyalty and integrity of the marital relationship.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, in any criminal proceeding, a spouse shall not be (1) required to testify to a confidential communication made by one spouse to the other during the marriage, or (2) allowed to testify to a confidential communication made by one spouse to the other during the marriage, over the objection of the other spouse.

(c) The testimony of a spouse regarding a confidential communication may be compelled, in the same manner as for any other witness, in a criminal proceeding against the other spouse for (1) joint participation with the spouse in what was, at the time the communication was made, criminal conduct or conspiracy to commit a crime, (2) bodily injury, sexual assault or other violence attempted, committed or threatened upon the spouse, or (3) bodily injury, sexual assault, risk of injury pursuant to section 53-21, or other violence attempted, committed or threatened upon the minor child of either spouse, or any minor child in the care or custody of either spouse.

(P.A. 11-152, S. 15.)

Language in Subsec. (a) re “induced by the affection, confidence, loyalty and integrity of the marital relationship” adds a separate element to, and effectively narrows the scope of, the common-law marital communications privilege; statements must be brought about or caused by the affection, confidence, loyalty and integrity of the marital relationship, and therefore, statements made by defendant for the purpose of furthering extramarital affair and attempting to murder her husband did not fall within language of Subsec. (a). 320 C. 123.

“Induced by affection” requirement limits privilege to subset of those confidential statements made between spouses in a valid marriage which are induced by the affection, confidence, loyalty and integrity of the marital relationship. 153 CA 419; judgment affirmed, see 320 C. 123.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: State v. Davaloo, No. SC19416 (Conn. Jan. 12, 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Davaloo, No. SC19416 (Conn. Jan. 12, 2016). · cites it 21× “Consequently, in order for a communica- tion to be privileged under § 54-84b, the communication must be: (1) made to a spouse during a marriage; (2) confidential; and (3) induced by the affection, confi- dence, loyalty and integrity of the marital relationship.”
State v. Davalloo, 320 Conn. 123 (Conn. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 12× “To the extent that our review requires us to examine General Statutes § 54-84b (b), the statute codifying the marital communications privilege, our review is ple- nary.”
Davalloo v. Kaplan, No. 3:17-cv-01257 (D. Conn. Aug. 8, 2020). · cites it 7× “In doing so, the Appellate Court applied Connecticut’s principles of statutory construction and held that the plain language of § 54-84b provides that, in order for the privilege to apply, the statement in question must be “induced by the affection, confidence, loyalty and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.