Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 6-31 (2025)

Authority

✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 6-31 is repealed, effective December 1, 2000.

(1949 Rev., S. 452; P.A. 00-99, S. 153, 154.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1967–2003 · leading case: State v. Floyd, 584 A.2d 1157 (Conn. 1991).
State v. Floyd, 584 A.2d 1157 (Conn. 1991). · cites it 2× “, General Statutes § 6-31 (sheriffs) and § 7-90 (constables).”
Thomas v. Zaharek, 289 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D. Conn. 2003). · cites it 3× “” Conn. Gen.Stat. § 6-31 (1998). After his demotion, Thomas retained all the statutory powers that he previously held as a special deputy sheriff with the captain’s rank.”
State v. Boles, 240 A.2d 920 (Conn. App. Ct. 1967). · cites it 3× “Laws 394 § 12 [2]) and General Statutes § 6-31. It seems clear that under these two statutory provisions, and in view of the circumstances then prevailing, the mayor acted within his authority.”
Antinerella v. Rioux, 690 A.2d 450 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1995). · cites it 2× “Consequently, he reasons, whatever he did while running for reelection was ipso facto done as a private citizen. The plaintiff counters with alternative arguments.”
Rioux v. State Ethics Comm'n, 709 A.2d 613 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes §§ 6-31, 6-33, 6-40 and 6-41.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.