Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 6-31 (2025)
Authority
✓ laws through the 2024 session: the source has not yet published 2025 Public Acts (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 6-31 is repealed, effective December 1, 2000.
(1949 Rev., S. 452; P.A. 00-99, S. 153, 154.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1967–2003 · leading case: State v. Floyd, 584 A.2d 1157 (Conn. 1991).
State v. Floyd, 584 A.2d 1157 (Conn. 1991). “, General Statutes § 6-31 (sheriffs) and § 7-90 (constables).”
Thomas v. Zaharek, 289 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D. Conn. 2003). “” Conn. Gen.Stat. § 6-31 (1998). After his demotion, Thomas retained all the statutory powers that he previously held as a special deputy sheriff with the captain’s rank.”
State v. Boles, 240 A.2d 920 (Conn. App. Ct. 1967). “Laws 394 § 12 [2]) and General Statutes § 6-31. It seems clear that under these two statutory provisions, and in view of the circumstances then prevailing, the mayor acted within his authority.”
Antinerella v. Rioux, 690 A.2d 450 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1995). “Consequently, he reasons, whatever he did while running for reelection was ipso facto done as a private citizen. The plaintiff counters with alternative arguments.”
Rioux v. State Ethics Comm'n, 709 A.2d 613 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1997). “See General Statutes §§ 6-31, 6-33, 6-40 and 6-41.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.