Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-152c (2026)

Hearing procedure for citations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Any municipality as defined in subsection (a) of section 7-148 may establish by ordinance a citation hearing procedure in accordance with this section. The Superior Court shall be authorized to enforce the assessments and judgments provided for under this section.

(b) The chief executive officer of any such municipality shall appoint one or more citation hearing officers, other than police officers or employees or persons who issue citations, to conduct the hearings authorized by this section.

(c) Any such municipality, at any time within twelve months from the expiration of the final period for the uncontested payment of fines, penalties, costs or fees for any citation issued under any ordinance adopted pursuant to section 7-148, 14-279c, 14-307c, 14-307j or 22a-226d, for an alleged violation thereof, shall send notice to the person cited. Such notice shall inform the person cited: (1) Of the allegations against such person and the amount of the fines, penalties, costs or fees due; (2) that such person may contest such person's liability before a citation hearing officer by delivering in person or by mail written notice within ten days of the date thereof; (3) that if such person does not demand such a hearing, an assessment and judgment shall be entered against such person; and (4) that such judgment may issue without further notice. For purposes of this section, notice shall be presumed to have been properly sent if such notice was mailed to such person's last-known address on file with the tax collector. If the person to whom such notice is issued is a registrant, the municipality may deliver such notice in accordance with section 7-148ii, provided nothing in this section shall preclude a municipality from providing notice in another manner permitted by applicable law.

(d) If the person who is sent notice pursuant to subsection (c) of this section wishes to admit liability for any alleged violation, he may, without requesting a hearing, pay the full amount of the fines, penalties, costs or fees admitted to in person or by mail to an official designated by such municipality. Such payment shall be inadmissible in any proceeding, civil or criminal, to establish the conduct of such person or other person making the payment. Any person who does not deliver or mail written demand for a hearing within ten days of the date of the first notice provided for in subsection (c) of this section shall be deemed to have admitted liability, and the designated municipal official shall certify such person's failure to respond to the hearing officer. The hearing officer shall thereupon enter and assess the fines, penalties, costs or fees provided for by the applicable ordinances and shall follow the procedures set forth in subsection (f) of this section.

(e) Any person who requests a hearing shall be given written notice of the date, time and place for the hearing. Such hearing shall be held not less than fifteen days nor more than thirty days from the date of the mailing of notice, provided the hearing officer shall grant upon good cause shown any reasonable request by any interested party for postponement or continuance. An original or certified copy of the initial notice of violation issued by the issuing official or policeman shall be filed and retained by the municipality, and shall be deemed to be a business record within the scope of section 52-180 and evidence of the facts contained therein. The presence of the issuing official or policeman shall be required at the hearing if such person so requests. A person wishing to contest his liability shall appear at the hearing and may present evidence in his behalf. A designated municipal official, other than the hearing officer, may present evidence on behalf of the municipality. If such person fails to appear, the hearing officer may enter an assessment by default against him upon a finding of proper notice and liability under the applicable statutes or ordinances. The hearing officer may accept from such person copies of police reports, investigatory and citation reports, and other official documents by mail and may determine thereby that the appearance of such person is unnecessary. The hearing officer shall conduct the hearing in the order and form and with such methods of proof as he deems fair and appropriate. The rules regarding the admissibility of evidence shall not be strictly applied, but all testimony shall be given under oath or affirmation. The hearing officer shall announce his decision at the end of the hearing. If he determines that the person is not liable, he shall dismiss the matter and enter his determination in writing accordingly. If he determines that the person is liable for the violation, he shall forthwith enter and assess the fines, penalties, costs or fees against such person as provided by the applicable ordinances of the municipality.

(f) If such assessment is not paid on the date of its entry, the hearing officer shall send by first class mail a notice of the assessment to the person found liable and shall file, not less than thirty days or more than twelve months after such mailing, a certified copy of the notice of assessment with the clerk of a superior court facility designated by the Chief Court Administrator together with an entry fee of eight dollars. The certified copy of the notice of assessment shall constitute a record of assessment. Within such twelve-month period, assessments against the same person may be accrued and filed as one record of assessment. The clerk shall enter judgment, in the amount of such record of assessment and court costs of eight dollars, against such person in favor of the municipality. Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes, the hearing officer's assessment, when so entered as a judgment, shall have the effect of a civil money judgment and a levy of execution on such judgment may issue without further notice to such person.

(g) A person against whom an assessment has been entered pursuant to this section is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal. An appeal shall be instituted within thirty days of the mailing of notice of such assessment by filing a petition to reopen assessment, together with an entry fee in an amount equal to the entry fee for a small claims case pursuant to section 52-259, at a superior court facility designated by the Chief Court Administrator, which shall entitle such person to a hearing in accordance with the rules of the judges of the Superior Court.

(P.A. 88-221, S. 2; P.A. 94-200, S. 2; P.A. 00-191, S. 4, 16; P.A. 02-132, S. 63; P.A. 03-278, S. 13; P.A. 09-144, S. 4; P.A. 13-132, S. 2; P.A. 23-116, S. 14; P.A. 24-107, S. 5; 24-151, S. 136.)

History: P.A. 94-200 amended Subsec. (c) to include enforcement of ordinances adopted under Sec. 22a-226d; P.A. 00-191 amended Subsec. (f) by changing provision that copy of notice of assessment be filed with clerk of superior court facility designated by the Chief Court Administrator within boundaries of judicial district instead of superior court for the geographical area, effective September 1, 2000; P.A. 02-132 amended Subsec. (f) by deleting “within the boundaries of the judicial district in which the municipality is located” and making a technical change and amended Subsec. (g) by replacing “in the superior court for the geographical area in which the municipality is located” with “at a superior court facility designated by the Chief Court Administrator”; P.A. 03-278 made a technical change in Subsec. (f), effective July 9, 2003; P.A. 09-144 amended Subsec. (c) by allowing notice to be delivered to a registrant in accordance with Sec. 7-148ii; P.A. 13-132 amended Subsec. (c) by adding provision re notice presumed to have been properly sent if mailed to last-known address on file with tax collector; P.A. 23-116 amended Subsec. (c) to add reference to Sec. 14-307c and make technical changes; P.A. 24-107 amended Subsec. (c) to add reference to Sec. 14-279c, effective July 1, 2024; P.A. 24-151 amended Subsec. (c) to add reference to Sec. 14-307j, effective July 1, 2024.

Defendant's attempt to collaterally challenge an assessment by means of a motion to open failed to strictly comply with right established by Subsec. (g) to appeal from the assessment, thus the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant such motion to open and reduce the amount of the assessment. 150 CA 736.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2022 · leading case: Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 204 A.3d 1138 (Conn. 2019).
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 204 A.3d 1138 (Conn. 2019). · cites it 29× “A person subject to an assessment of fines under § 7-152c"is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal.”
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 163 A.3d 631 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 39× “Instead of appealing the assessments entered by the hearing officer to the Superior Court through the administrative procedure set forth in the code and General Statutes § 7-152c (g), 4 the plaintiff brought an action alleging a violation of his due process rights and a taking…”
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 163 A.3d 689 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 16× “The plaintiff did not appeal from the decisions of the hearing officer to the Superior Court pursuant to § 91-2 (G) of the town's citation hearing procedure ordinance or General Statutes § 7-152c (g). 2 The fines that remain and are at issue are those imposed from September 4…”
Rutka v. City of Meriden, 75 A.3d 722 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 5× “General Statutes § 7-152c (g). The defendant followed the procedures set out in § 7-152c for the enforcement of assessments and judgments.”
Fillion v. Hannon, 943 A.2d 528 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 6× “Pursuant to General Statutes § 7-152c (g), the petitioner filed a petition with the court to open Hannon’s assessment.”
Williams v. Mansfield, 215 Conn. App. 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 3× “4 In both his petition and amended petition; see footnote 5 of this opinion; the plaintiff stated that he was appealing the assessment pursuant to General Statutes § 7-152c (g), which is the incorrect statute.”
Berka v. Middletown, 205 Conn. App. 213 (Conn. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “) 3 General Statutes § 7-152c (g) provides: ‘‘A person against whom an assessment has been entered pursuant to this section is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal.”
Petrucelli v. Meriden, 198 Conn. App. 838 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 9× “’’ The city may enforce a violation pursuant to § 159-7 of the anti-blight ordinance ‘‘by citation, in addition to other remedies, in accordance with [General Statutes § 7-152c].’’ Section 7-152c, which largely parallels § 7-152b, enables municipalities to establish ‘‘a cita-…”
Berka v. Middletown (Conn. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 9× “On January 10, 2018, the plaintiff was issued a notice of blight pursuant to chapter 120, article 11, § 120-25A of the City of Middletown Code of Ordi- nances (ordinance),2 which was enacted in accordance with General Statutes § 7-152c (a). On February 14, 2018, after the…”
Stratford v. Sokol (Conn. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 12× “At no point did the defendant contest liability by demanding a hearing before a citation hearing officer; see General Statutes § 7-152c (c); or avail herself of her statutory right to appeal from the assessment.”
Petrucelli v. City of Meriden (Conn. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 6× “5 General Statutes § 7-152c provides in relevant part: ‘‘(a) Any municipality as defined in subsection (a) of section 7-148 may establish by ordinance a citation hearing procedure in accordance with this section.”
Lee v. Driscoll (D. Conn. 2019). · cites it 2× “On March 16, 2016, the defendants moved to dismiss the action, arguing that it was untimely under Connecticut Practice Book § 23-51 and Connecticut General Statutes § 7-152c. Id., Entry No.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-152c(a) — 1 case
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 204 A.3d 1138 (Conn. 2019). “A person subject to an assessment of fines under § 7-152c"is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-152c(c) — 2 cases
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 163 A.3d 631 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “Instead of appealing the assessments entered by the hearing officer to the Superior Court through the administrative procedure set forth in the code and General Statutes § 7-152c (g), 4 the plaintiff brought an action alleging a violation of his due process rights and a taking…”
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 204 A.3d 1138 (Conn. 2019). “A person subject to an assessment of fines under § 7-152c"is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-152c(d) — 1 case
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 163 A.3d 631 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “Instead of appealing the assessments entered by the hearing officer to the Superior Court through the administrative procedure set forth in the code and General Statutes § 7-152c (g), 4 the plaintiff brought an action alleging a violation of his due process rights and a taking…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-152c(e) — 1 case
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 204 A.3d 1138 (Conn. 2019). “A person subject to an assessment of fines under § 7-152c"is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-152c(g) — 2 cases
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 204 A.3d 1138 (Conn. 2019). “A person subject to an assessment of fines under § 7-152c"is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal.”
Mangiafico v. Town of Farmington, 163 A.3d 631 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “Instead of appealing the assessments entered by the hearing officer to the Superior Court through the administrative procedure set forth in the code and General Statutes § 7-152c (g), 4 the plaintiff brought an action alleging a violation of his due process rights and a taking…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.