Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 07 — MUNICIPALITIES · Chapter 90 — Town and Other Community Meetings
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-4 (2026)

Record of warning

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The person who posts, causes to be published or in any other manner gives notice of the warning for any meeting of a town, city, borough, school district or other public community or of an ecclesiastical society shall make return, in writing, to the person whose duty it is to keep a record of such meeting, showing the notice given of such warning, and such return shall be kept on file and recorded at length with the warning or doings of such meeting.

(1949 Rev., S. 494; 1953, S. 212d.)

As to necessity of recording warning, see 121 U.S. 121.

Recorded return of notice of warning best evidence of contents of warning. 97 C. 633.

Town not charged with the neglect of its officers to file sufficient notice of town meeting. 29 CS 59.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 156 A.3d 539 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
R.T. Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 156 A.3d 539 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 12× “McKinley claims that the court improperly admitted those materials as substantive evidence for the truth of the information contained therein, in contravention of § 7-4 (b) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence.”
Viera v. Cohen, 927 A.2d 843 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 8× “§ 7-4 (a). “An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, 2 A.3d 963 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 8× “The facts need not be admissible in evidence if of a type customarily relied on by experts in the particular field in forming opinions on the subject . .”
State v. Walker, 212 A.3d 1244 (Conn. 2019). · cites it 5× “Indeed, § 7-4 (b) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence provides in relevant part: "The facts in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion may be those perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the proceeding.”
State v. Carpenter, 882 A.2d 604 (Conn. 2005). · cites it 4× “§ 7-4 (b), commentary (expert testimony may be predicated on facts made known to expert at trial or presented in form of hypothetical).”
State of Connecticut v. David N.J., 19 A.3d 646 (Conn. 2011). · cites it 7× “2d 836 (1939), and notes that the commentary to § 7-4 (c) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence 10 supports his argument *130 that, as a hypothetical question to an expert witness, § 7-4 (c) should have been applied with increased liberality because the question was intended to…”
Maher v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 847 A.2d 978 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 5× “The defendants claim that the trial court improperly: (1) permitted the plaintiffs expert witness to testify regarding the issue of causation in violation of § 7-4 (b) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence 3 and our opinion in State v.”
Bagley v. Adel Wiggins Grp., 171 A.3d 432 (Conn. 2017). · cites it 3× “§ 7-4(a). An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
Clerk of the Superior Court v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 895 A.2d 743 (Conn. 2006). · cites it 4× “" [5] Collins cited Practice Book § 7-4, which provides in relevant part: "The clerk shall keep daybooks in which to enter each case on the date upon which the matter is filed on a docket of the court location.”
Farrell v. Bass, 879 A.2d 516 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005). · cites it 4× “Instead, the plaintiffs cite § 7-4 (b) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence as support for their claim that the court improperly precluded Shearer from testifying about the *817 article.”
Poulin v. Yasner, 781 A.2d 422 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 2× “16 Section 7-4 of the Connecticut Code of Evidence allows an expert to offer an opinion and his reasons *742 for that opinion provided sufficient facts are shown as the foundation for the expert’s opinion.”
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy, 939 A.2d 591 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 7-4 (a), commentary, citing Liskiewicz v.”
Show all 56 citing cases →
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-4(a) — 4 cases
Viera v. Cohen, 927 A.2d 843 (Conn. 2007). “§ 7-4 (a). “An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, 2 A.3d 963 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). “The facts need not be admissible in evidence if of a type customarily relied on by experts in the particular field in forming opinions on the subject . .”
Bagley v. Adel Wiggins Grp., 171 A.3d 432 (Conn. 2017). “§ 7-4(a). An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy, 939 A.2d 591 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). “§ 7-4 (a), commentary, citing Liskiewicz v.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-4(b) — 3 cases
DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, 2 A.3d 963 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010). “The facts need not be admissible in evidence if of a type customarily relied on by experts in the particular field in forming opinions on the subject . .”
Viera v. Cohen, 927 A.2d 843 (Conn. 2007). “§ 7-4 (a). “An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
State v. Walker, 183 A.3d 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-4(c) — 2 cases
Viera v. Cohen, 927 A.2d 843 (Conn. 2007). “§ 7-4 (a). “An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
Bagley v. Adel Wiggins Grp., 171 A.3d 432 (Conn. 2017). “§ 7-4(a). An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-4(c)(1) — 1 case
Bagley v. Adel Wiggins Grp., 171 A.3d 432 (Conn. 2017). “§ 7-4(a). An expert may have personal knowledge of the underlying facts or may obtain the requisite information by attending the trial and hearing the factual testimony.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.