On v. Kulak, 320 A.3d 236 (Del. 2024). · Go Syfert
Search
On v. Kulak, 320 A.3d 236 (Del. 2024). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
On
v.
Kulak
216, 2024.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jul 1, 2024.
Published opinion
✓ 320 A.3d 236 gap-fill: Leagle volume listing
Griffiths J..
Published
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ITSHAK ON and KEREN-OR ON,Defendants Below,Appellants,v.KEVIN KULAK,Plaintiff Below,Appellee.
No. 216, 2024Court Below: Court of Chanceryof the State of DelawareC.A. No. 2023-0011
Submitted: June 11, 2024
Decided: July 1, 2024

ORDER

[*~236–237]

On May 29, 2024, the Senior Clerk issued a notice directing the appellants to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for the appellants’ failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an interlocutory order. The notice was served on the appellants through the Court’s electronic filing system. The appellants have not responded to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period. Dismissal of this appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice