Limitation on excusing contempt based on order error
Also stated as: Void orders cannot support valid contempt judgments
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Limitation on excusing contempt based on order error
Ranked by how often Delaware courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Delaware opinions citing these pages
- Deutsch v. ZST Digit. Networks, Inc., No. CA 8014-VCL, 2018 WL 3005822 (Del. Ch. June 14, 2018)
- Eagle Force Holdings, LLC v. Stanely v. Campbell, No. 10803-VCMR (Del. Ch. Sept. 1, 2017)
- Thomas v. Thomas, 102 A.3d 1138 (Del. 2014)
- Cohen v. State ex rel. Stewart, 89 A.3d 65 (Del. 2014)
- Massey v. Ball, 595 A.2d 390 (Del. 1991)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
Filed under: Contempt of Court and Enforcement
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law