Del. Super. Ct. R. Civ. P. 30 (2026)
Rule 30. (b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails (1) to appear before the officer who is to take
Rule 30(b)(6) or 31(a) to testify on behalf of a party fails (1) to appear before the officer who is to take the deposition, after being served with a proper notice, or (2) to serve answers or objections to interrogatories submitted under Rule 33, after proper service of the interrogatories, or (3) to serve a written response to a request for inspection submitted under Rule 34, after proper service of the request, the Court in which the action is pending on motion may make such orders in regard to the failure as are just, and among others it may take any action authorized under paragraphs (A), (B), and (C) of subdivision (b)(2) of this Rule. In lieu of any order or in addition thereto, the Court shall require the party failing to act or the attorney advising that party or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure, unless the Court finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust. The failure to act described in this paragraph may not be excused on the ground that the discovery sought is objectionable unless the party failing to act has applied for a protective order as provided by Rule 26(c). (e) Presentation of motions. All motions which are filed pursuant to Rule 26(c), 26(d) or 37 of the Superior Court Civil Rules, with the exception of motions filed during the pendency of an oral deposition, shall be presented to the Court as follows: (1) No motion shall be filed pursuant to Rule 26(c), 26(d) or 37 of the Superior Court Civil Rules, and no such motion shall be accepted by the Prothonotary, unless such motion shall include a certification by the moving party detailing the dates, time spent, and method of communication in attempting to reach agreement on the subject of the motion with the other party or parties and the results, if any, of such communication, provided that the certification shall not be required for motions filed pursuant to