The Agreement on Detainers is enacted into law and entered into by this State with all other jurisdictions legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows:
The contracting states solemnly agree that the party states find that charges outstanding against a prisoner, detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints, and difficulties in securing speedy trial of persons already incarcerated in other jurisdictions, produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation. Accordingly, it is the policy of the party states and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints. The party states also find that proceedings with reference to such charges and detainers, when emanating from another jurisdiction, cannot properly be had in the absence of cooperative procedures. It is the further purpose of this agreement to provide such cooperative procedures.
11 Del. C. 1953,
§
2540;
57 Del. Laws, c. 223,
§
1;
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1973–2022 · leading case:
Pittman v. State, 301 A.2d 509 (Del. 1973).
Pittman v. State, 301 A.2d 509 (Del. 1973).
· cites it 2× “it is the policy of the party States and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints.”
Beebe v. Vaughn, 430 F. Supp. 1220 (D. Del. 1977).
“11 Del.C. § 2540. The charging State, on the other hand, has an interest in bringing to trial those who are charged with violations of its laws.”
State v. Harris (Del. Super. Ct. 2017).
· cites it 2× “2017) (citing 11 Del. C. § 2540). 26 11 Del. C. § 2540.”
State v. Logan (Del. Super. Ct. 2020).
“2 11 Del. C. § 2540, et seq. 3 State v. McDowell, 824 A.”
State v. Slaughter (Del. Super. Ct. 2021).
“See 11 Del. C. §§ 2540–2550. The terms “UAD” and “IAD” will be used interchangeably throughout this opinion, but all citations will be to the UAD statute provisions as “UAD Section ___.”
Slaughter v. State (Del. 2022).
“” (4) We disagree, though, with the Superior Court’s conclusion that Slaughter’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims were procedurally barred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.