Delaware Code
11 Del. C. § 275 (2026)
Indictment as principal and conviction as accomplice; indictment as accomplice and conviction as principal
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) A person indicted for committing an offense may be convicted as an accomplice to another person guilty of committing the offense.
(b) A person indicted as an accomplice to an offense committed by another person may be convicted as a principal.
11 Del. C. 1953, § 275; 58 Del. Laws, c. 497, § 1;Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: State v. Broomer (Del. Super. Ct. 2023).
State v. Broomer (Del. Super. Ct. 2023). “Under 11 Del. C. § 275(a) “[a] person 15 Super.”
Newton v. State (Del. 2015). “, 11 Del. C. § 275(a) (“A person indicted for committing an offense may be convicted as an accomplice to another person guilty of committing the offense”); 11 Del.”
Thomas v. State (Del. 2015). “16 (18) This Court has reviewed the record carefully and has concluded that Thomas’s appeal is wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue.”
— 11 Del. C. § 275(a) — 2 cases
State v. Broomer (Del. Super. Ct. 2023). “Under 11 Del. C. § 275(a) “[a] person 15 Super.”
Newton v. State (Del. 2015). “, 11 Del. C. § 275(a) (“A person indicted for committing an offense may be convicted as an accomplice to another person guilty of committing the offense”); 11 Del.”
— 11 Del. C. § 275(b) — 1 case
State v. Broomer (Del. Super. Ct. 2023). “Under 11 Del. C. § 275(a) “[a] person 15 Super.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.