Delaware Code

12 Del. C. § 2317 (2026)

Abatement

✓ laws through the 2025-26 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section and except as provided in connection with the elective share of the surviving spouse who elects to take an elective share, shares of distributees abate, with personal property to be abated prior to real property within each class, in the following order:

(1) Property not disposed of by the will;

(2) Residuary bequests and devises;

(3) General bequests and devises;

(4) Specific bequests and devises.

For purposes of abatement, a general bequest or devise charged on any specific property or fund is a specific bequest or devise to the extent of the value of the property on which it is charged, and upon the failure or insufficiency of the property on which it is charged, a general bequest or devise to the extent of the failure or insufficiency. Abatement within each classification is in proportion to the amounts of property each of the beneficiaries would have received if full distribution of the property had been made in accordance with the terms of the will.

(b) If the will expresses an order of abatement, or if the testamentary plan or the express or implied purpose of the devise would be defeated by the order of abatement stated in subsection (a) of this section, the shares of the distributees abate as may be found necessary to give effect to the intention of the testator.

(c) If the subject of a preferred bequest or devise is sold or used incident to administration, abatement shall be achieved by appropriate adjustments in, or contribution from, other interests in the remaining assets.

Code 1852, §  2594;  Code 1915, §  4522;  Code 1935, §  4976;  12 Del. C. 1953, §  2317;  59 Del. Laws, c. 384, §  1;  64 Del. Laws, c. 252, §  7; 
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1975–1975 · leading case: Vredenburgh v. Jones, 349 A.2d 22 (Del. Ch. 1975).
Vredenburgh v. Jones, 349 A.2d 22 (Del. Ch. 1975). “At the very least 12 Del.C. § 2317 mandates that legacies shall abate proportionately where there is an insufficient surplus after the payment of debts to satisfy them in full.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.