(a) [Repealed.]
(b) Any person who knowingly or intentionally uses, consumes, or possesses other than a personal use quantity of a controlled substance or a counterfeit controlled substance classified in § 4714(d)(19) of this title, except as otherwise authorized by this chapter, shall be guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and be fined not more than $575, imprisoned not more than 3 months, or both.
(c) (1), (2) [Repealed.]
(3) A person under 21 years of age who knowingly or intentionally possesses, uses, or consumes a personal use quantity of a controlled substance or a counterfeit controlled substance classified in § 4714(d)(19) of this title, must be assessed a civil penalty of $100 for a first violation of this subsection and a civil penalty of not less than $200 nor more than $500 for a second violation of this subsection and is guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and must be fined $100 for a third or subsequent violation of this subsection. A peace officer having reasonable grounds to believe that a juvenile has committed a violation of this subsection may issue the juvenile a civil citation in lieu of a civil penalty.
(4) [Repealed.]
(d) Any person who knowingly or intentionally uses or consumes up to a personal use quantity of a controlled substance or a counterfeit controlled substance classified in § 4714(d)(19) of this title in an area accessible to the public or in a moving vehicle, except as otherwise authorized by this chapter, shall be guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and be fined not more than $200, imprisoned not more than 5 days, or both. For purposes of this section “area accessible to the public’' means any of the following:
(1) Sidewalks, streets, alleys, parking lots, parks, playgrounds, stores, restaurants, and any other areas to which the general public is invited.
(2) Any outdoor location within a distance of 10 feet from a sidewalk, street, alley, parking lot, park, playground, store, restaurant, or any other area to which the general public is invited.
(3) Any outdoor location within a distance of 10 feet from the entrances, exits, windows that open, or ventilation intakes of any public or private building.
(e) Information concerning a civil offense classified in subsection (c) of this section shall not appear on a person’s certified criminal record.
(f) Nothing contained herein shall be construed to repeal or modify any law concerning the medical use of marijuana or tetrahydrocannabinol in any other form, such as Marinol, or the possession of more than 1 ounce of marijuana, or selling, manufacturing, or trafficking in marijuana.
(g) Nothing contained herein shall be construed to repeal or modify existing laws, ordinances or bylaws, regulations, personnel practices, or policies concerning the operation of motor vehicles or other actions taken while under the influence of marijuana.
(h) [Repealed.]
(i) Any person who was convicted of a single criminal offense under subsection (c) of this section, as it is in effect on or before July 31, 2019, and who was under the age of 21 at the time of the offense may, upon reaching the age of 21, apply for an expungement of the record of the conviction and any indicia of arrest to the court in which the person was convicted. For violations of a criminal offense under subsection (c) of this section, as it is in effect on or before July 31, 2019, an order granting such expungement shall issue upon proof that the person has reached the age of 21, unless the person has failed to comply with the sentencing order or the person has another charge under this section which remains outstanding. Upon issuance of the order of expungement, the records of the conviction and any indicia of arrest shall be dealt with in accordance with the procedures specified in subchapter VII of Chapter 43 of Title 11. Nothing in this section prohibits a court from expunging a record of conviction as otherwise provided by law. The application for or granting of a pardon under §§ 4361 through 4364 of Title 11 does not prohibit an expungement under this section. All sentencing orders for violations of a criminal offense under subsection (c) of this section, as it is in effect on or before July 31, 2019, by persons under the age of 21 at the time of the offense must state that the record of the conviction may be expunged upon reaching the age of 21 and thereafter. The civil filing fee applies to applications for expungement plus a $100 fee payable to the State Bureau of Identification for administrative costs.
(j) [Repealed.]
78 Del. Laws, c. 13,
§
61;
80 Del. Laws, c. 38,
§
2;
81 Del. Laws, c. 394,
§
1;
82 Del. Laws, c. 83,
§
12;
82 Del. Laws, c. 182,
§
1;
82 Del. Laws, c. 217,
§
14;
83 Del. Laws, c. 198,
§
2;
83 Del. Laws, c. 266,
§
8;
84 Del. Laws, c. 15,
§
1;
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
32
cases (
15 in the last 5 years), 1974–2025 · leading case:
Rash v. State, 318 A.2d 603 (Del. 1974).
Rash v. State, 318 A.2d 603 (Del. 1974).
· cites it 3× “DUFFY, Justice: This appeal brings up for review a disposition under 16 Del.C. § 4764 by the Superior Court in a criminal prosecution.”
Juliano v. State of Delaware (Del. 2021).
· cites it 10× “Any person 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age, who possessed a personal-use quantity of marijuana was, under the 2015 amendments, subject to a civil penalty of $100 for a first offense, “but guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and fined $100 for a second or…”
State v. Brown (Del. Super. Ct. 2023).
· cites it 6× “In 2015, the General Assembly passed into law 16 Del. C. § 4764, which decriminalizes possession of marijuana by adults in personal use quantities but leaves in place a civil penalty for possession and provides that marijuana is still subject to civil forfeiture.”
State v. Jernigan (Del. Super. Ct. 2019).
· cites it 5× “6 analysis with regard to personal use amounts, notwithstanding the new reality that possession and use of such an amount generates only civil liability. 12 DMMA’s structure, however, is markedly different from the law decriminalizing personal use quantities of marijuana.”
State v. Murray (Del. Super. Ct. 2017).
· cites it 4× “§ l448(a)(9) and misdemeanor possession of marijuana under 16 Del. C. § 4764(b)); St.’s Resp., State v.”
State v. Murray (Del. Super. Ct. 2017).
· cites it 4× “§ 1448(a)(9) and misdemeanor possession of marijuana under 16 Del. C. § 4764(b)); St.’s Resp., State v.”
State v. Rose (Del. Super. Ct. 2022).
· cites it 3× “39); 16 Del. C. § 4764. 49 16 Del. C. §§ 4701, 4764.”
Lloyd v. State (Del. 2023).
· cites it 3× “§§ 4701 and 4764 to decriminalize personal use quantities of marijuana.”
State v. Johnson (Del. Super. Ct. 2024).
· cites it 3× “Kashner had reasonable suspicion of the crimes of possession of marijuana by a person under 21 and/or consumption of marijuana while operating a motor vehicle, in violation of 16 Del. C. § 4764. It was clear from the BWC video and Sgt.”
Valentine v. State (Del. 2019).
· cites it 2× “), and the odor gave Lawson probable cause to believe that Valentine’s car contained contraband, in particular, marijuana.”
State of Delaware v. Randolph Lucas (Del. Ct. Com. Pl. 2015).
· cites it 2× “INTRODUCTION On March 14, 2015, Randolph Allen Lucas (“Defendant”) was arrested and charged with Possession of Marijuana with an Aggravating Factor, in violation of 16 Del. C. § 4764(a), and Failure When Moving Right, Left or Turning to Signal Continuously Not Less Than 300…”
State v. Brown (Del. Super. Ct. 2018).
“§ 4752(1); one count of Possession of Marijuana With Aggravating Factors, 16 Del. C. § 4764(1); one count of Tier 5 Possession, 16 Del.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(1) — 2 cases
State v. Brown (Del. Super. Ct. 2018).
“§ 4752(1); one count of Possession of Marijuana With Aggravating Factors, 16 Del. C. § 4764(1); one count of Tier 5 Possession, 16 Del.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(a) — 6 cases
Juliano v. State of Delaware (Del. 2021).
“Any person 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age, who possessed a personal-use quantity of marijuana was, under the 2015 amendments, subject to a civil penalty of $100 for a first offense, “but guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and fined $100 for a second or…”
State of Delaware v. Randolph Lucas (Del. Ct. Com. Pl. 2015).
“INTRODUCTION On March 14, 2015, Randolph Allen Lucas (“Defendant”) was arrested and charged with Possession of Marijuana with an Aggravating Factor, in violation of 16 Del. C. § 4764(a), and Failure When Moving Right, Left or Turning to Signal Continuously Not Less Than 300…”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(b) — 4 cases
State v. Murray (Del. Super. Ct. 2017).
“§ l448(a)(9) and misdemeanor possession of marijuana under 16 Del. C. § 4764(b)); St.’s Resp., State v.”
State v. Murray (Del. Super. Ct. 2017).
“§ 1448(a)(9) and misdemeanor possession of marijuana under 16 Del. C. § 4764(b)); St.’s Resp., State v.”
Juliano v. State of Delaware (Del. 2021).
“Any person 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age, who possessed a personal-use quantity of marijuana was, under the 2015 amendments, subject to a civil penalty of $100 for a first offense, “but guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and fined $100 for a second or…”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(c) — 9 cases
State v. Murray (Del. Super. Ct. 2017).
“§ l448(a)(9) and misdemeanor possession of marijuana under 16 Del. C. § 4764(b)); St.’s Resp., State v.”
State v. Murray (Del. Super. Ct. 2017).
“§ 1448(a)(9) and misdemeanor possession of marijuana under 16 Del. C. § 4764(b)); St.’s Resp., State v.”
Valentine v. State (Del. 2019).
“), and the odor gave Lawson probable cause to believe that Valentine’s car contained contraband, in particular, marijuana.”
State v. Jernigan (Del. Super. Ct. 2019).
“6 analysis with regard to personal use amounts, notwithstanding the new reality that possession and use of such an amount generates only civil liability. 12 DMMA’s structure, however, is markedly different from the law decriminalizing personal use quantities of marijuana.”
Juliano v. State of Delaware (Del. 2021).
“Any person 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age, who possessed a personal-use quantity of marijuana was, under the 2015 amendments, subject to a civil penalty of $100 for a first offense, “but guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and fined $100 for a second or…”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(c)(1) — 3 cases
State v. Brown (Del. Super. Ct. 2023).
“In 2015, the General Assembly passed into law 16 Del. C. § 4764, which decriminalizes possession of marijuana by adults in personal use quantities but leaves in place a civil penalty for possession and provides that marijuana is still subject to civil forfeiture.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(c)(3) — 1 case
Juliano v. State of Delaware (Del. 2021).
“Any person 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age, who possessed a personal-use quantity of marijuana was, under the 2015 amendments, subject to a civil penalty of $100 for a first offense, “but guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and fined $100 for a second or…”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(d) — 11 cases
Juliano v. State of Delaware (Del. 2021).
“Any person 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age, who possessed a personal-use quantity of marijuana was, under the 2015 amendments, subject to a civil penalty of $100 for a first offense, “but guilty of an unclassified misdemeanor and fined $100 for a second or…”
State v. Brown (Del. Super. Ct. 2023).
“In 2015, the General Assembly passed into law 16 Del. C. § 4764, which decriminalizes possession of marijuana by adults in personal use quantities but leaves in place a civil penalty for possession and provides that marijuana is still subject to civil forfeiture.”
Lloyd v. State (Del. 2023).
“§§ 4701 and 4764 to decriminalize personal use quantities of marijuana.”
Valentine v. State (Del. 2019).
“), and the odor gave Lawson probable cause to believe that Valentine’s car contained contraband, in particular, marijuana.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(g) — 1 case
State v. Jernigan (Del. Super. Ct. 2019).
“6 analysis with regard to personal use amounts, notwithstanding the new reality that possession and use of such an amount generates only civil liability. 12 DMMA’s structure, however, is markedly different from the law decriminalizing personal use quantities of marijuana.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(h) — 3 cases
State v. Rose (Del. Super. Ct. 2022).
“39); 16 Del. C. § 4764. 49 16 Del. C. §§ 4701, 4764.”
State v. Jernigan (Del. Super. Ct. 2019).
“6 analysis with regard to personal use amounts, notwithstanding the new reality that possession and use of such an amount generates only civil liability. 12 DMMA’s structure, however, is markedly different from the law decriminalizing personal use quantities of marijuana.”
— 16 Del. C. § 4764(j) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.