As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) “Article” means a product as distinguished from its trademark, label, or distinctive dress in packaging.
(2) “Certification mark” means a mark used in connection with the goods or services of a person other than the certifier to indicate geographic origin, material, mode of manufacture, quality, accuracy, or other characteristics of the goods or services or to indicate that the work or labor on the goods or services was performed by members of a union or other organization.
(3) “Collective mark” means a mark used by members of a cooperative, association, or other collective group or organization to identify goods or services and distinguish them from those of others, or to indicate membership in the collective group or organization.
(4) “Mark” means a word, name, symbol, device, or any combination of the foregoing in any form or arrangement.
(5) “Person” means an individual, corporation, government, or governmental subdivision or agency, statutory trust, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, unincorporated association, 2 or more of any of the foregoing having a joint or common interest, or any other legal or commercial entity.
(6) “Service mark” means a mark used by a person to identify services and to distinguish them from the services of others.
(7) “Trademark” means a mark used by a person to identify goods and to distinguish them from the goods of others.
(8) “Trade name” means a word, name, symbol, device, or any combination of the foregoing in any form or arrangement used by a person to identify a business, vocation, or occupation and distinguish it from the business, vocation, or occupation of others.
6 Del. C. 1953,
§
2531;
55 Del. Laws, c. 36;
70 Del. Laws, c. 186,
§
1;
73 Del. Laws, c. 329,
§
36;
Notes of Decisions
Clontech Labs., Inc. v. Invitrogen Corp., 263 F. Supp. 2d 780 (D. Del. 2003).
· cites it 3× “§§ 1 , 2, and the Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), 6 Del. C. § 2531 et seq. (D.I.83, 137) The case was then temporarily stayed pending the outcome of related litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.”
Accenture Global Servs. GmbH v. Guidewire Software Inc., 581 F. Supp. 2d 654 (D. Del. 2008).
“Accenture also asserts claims for trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices in violation of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), 6 Del. C. §§ 2531 et seq., common law unfair competition, and tor-tious interference…”
DeJohn v. The. TV Corp. Intern., 245 F. Supp. 2d 913 (C.D. Ill. 2003).
“See 815 ILCS §§ 510/1 to 510/7 (Illinois); 6 Del.C. §§ 2531 to 2536 (Delaware); 10 M.”
Military Certified Residential Specialist, LLC v. Fairway Indep. Mortg. Corp., 251 F. Supp. 3d 750 (D. Del. 2017).
“§ 1125 (a) for false designation of origin, (3) engaged in unfair competition in violation of 6 Del. C. § 2531(4) violated Delaware common law for trademark infringement and unfair competition, (5) were unjustly enriched in violation of Delaware common law, and (6) intentionally…”
In re TD Bank, N.A., 150 F. Supp. 3d 593 (D.S.C. 2015).
“); Delaware: the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, (6 Del. C. § 2531 et seq.); Maryland: the.”
Toro Co. v. Textron, Inc., 499 F. Supp. 241 (D. Del. 1980).
“§ 1125 (a); common law unfair competition; common law disparagement, and violation of Delaware’s Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 6 Del.C. § 2531, et seq., in the advertising of its Sno-Burst snow thrower.”
Young v. Joyce, 351 A.2d 857 (Del. 1975).
· cites it 2× “6 Del.C. § 2531 et seq. codifies the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act which, in turn, codifies the common law of unfair competition, Mars, Inc.”
Acxiom Corp. v. Axiom, Inc., 27 F. Supp. 2d 478 (D. Del. 1998).
“§ 1125 (c); unfair competition under Delaware’s Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, 6 Del. C. §§ 2531 et seq. (the “Deceptive Trade Practices Act”); and common-law trademark, service mark and trade name infringement.”
Accenture Global Servs. GmbH v. Guidewire Software Inc., 691 F. Supp. 2d 577 (D. Del. 2010).
“Unfair competition and deceptive trade practices in violation of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act ("DTPA”), 6 Del. C. §§ 2531 et seq., common law unfair competition, and tortious interference with business relations.”
QVC, Inc. v. Your Vitamins, Inc., 753 F. Supp. 2d 428 (D. Del. 2010).
“§ 1125 (a) (hereinafter, “ § 43”), common law false advertising, violation of the Delaware Consumer Fraud Act, 6 Del. C. § 2531 et seq., and violation of the Delaware Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) against defendants Andrew Lessman (“Lessman”) and Your Vitamins,…”
Keurig, Inc. v. Strum Foods, Inc., 769 F. Supp. 2d 699 (D. Del. 2011).
“§ 1125 (a), and the Delaware Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), 6 Del. C. § 2531 (2009). (D.I. 8) In addition to the § 43(a) claims, plaintiff alleges that defendant’s use of its mark causes dilution in violation of Section 43(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.”
— 6 Del. C. § 2531(4) — 1 case
Military Certified Residential Specialist, LLC v. Fairway Indep. Mortg. Corp., 251 F. Supp. 3d 750 (D. Del. 2017).
“§ 1125 (a) for false designation of origin, (3) engaged in unfair competition in violation of 6 Del. C. § 2531(4) violated Delaware common law for trademark infringement and unfair competition, (5) were unjustly enriched in violation of Delaware common law, and (6) intentionally…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.