Clarifying developer liability under section 230
157 federal opinions cite these pages1996–202629 pages cited by federal courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Clarifying developer liability under section 230
- Cited for: Determining liability for information content providers
- Cited for: Defining information development and publisher prerogative under § 230
- Cited for: Defining platform liability under section 230
- Cited for: Analyzing liability for content distribution by internet providers
- Cited for: Defining "publisher" and editorial functions under section 230
- Cited for: Determining liability for actively shaping online content
- Cited for: Analyzing liability under section 230 for third-party content
Ranked by how often federal courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Federal opinions citing these pages
- Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 2 F.4th 871 (9th Cir. 2021)
- Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLC, No. 18-16700 (9th Cir. June 22, 2021)
- Douglas Kimzey v. Yelp!, 836 F.3d 1263 (9th Cir. 2016)
- Tawainna Anderson v. TikTok Inc, 116 F.4th 180 (3d Cir. 2024)
- D F Pace, Esquire v. Baker-white, 432 F. Supp. 3d 495 (E.D. Pa. 2020)
- Force v. Facebook, Inc., 934 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2019)
- Fields v. Twitter, Inc., 217 F. Supp. 3d 1116 (N.D. Cal. 2016)
- Fields v. Twitter, Inc., 200 F. Supp. 3d 964 (N.D. Cal. 2016)
- Ma ex rel. Pk v. Vill. Voice Media Holdings, 809 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (E.D. Mo. 2011)
- M.A. ex rel. P.K. v. Vill. Voice Media Holdings, LLC, 809 F. Supp. 2d 1041 (E.D. Mo. 2011)
- Doe, No. 1:26-cv-00123 (D.N.H. Sept. 8, 2026)
- Loudermill v. Hoskins, No. 2:25-cv-04032 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 7, 2025)
- Loudermill v. Brattin, No. 2:25-cv-04031 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 7, 2025)
- United States v. EZ Lynk, 149 F.4th 190 (2d Cir. 2025)
- Foley v. IRBsearch, LLC, No. 1:24-cv-01303 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2025)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 340 opinions
- 169 opinions
- 282 opinions
- 56 opinions
- 97 opinions
- 414 opinions
- 35 opinions
- 366 opinions
Filed under: Internet Liability and Computer Crime Law
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law