Claim construction of date representations in computer systems
175 federal opinions cite these pages1988–202622 pages cited by federal courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Claim construction of date representations in computer systems
- Cited for: Presuming receipt date when actual date is unknown
- Cited for: Determining the relevant date for document possession
- Cited for: Determining date of loan consummation when lender is identifiable
- Cited for: Allowing generality in date allegations when not essential
- Cited for: Determining sufficiency of date when using on or about
- Cited for: Determining effective date based on application form return
- Cited for: Reversal of finding and direction to fix execution date
Ranked by how often federal courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Federal opinions citing these pages
- Andrew Miller v. Pavestone, LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00032 (D. Colo. Mar. 17, 2026)
- Emissive Energy Corp. v. Olight Store USA, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-06214 (D.N.J. Mar. 16, 2026)
- Calvert, No. 1:24-cv-03165 (D. Colo. Dec. 11, 2025)
- Tabor v. Great W. Bldgs., No. 1:24-cv-01774 (D. Colo. Sept. 29, 2025)
- Floodbreak, LLC v. T. Moriarty & Son, Inc., 797 F. Supp. 3d 45 (E.D.N.Y. 2025)
- Unverferth Mfg Co Inc v. Par-Kan Co., No. 3:23-cv-00653 (N.D. Ind. Aug. 14, 2025)
- Am. Regent, Inc. v. Somerset Therapeutics, LLC, No. 2:24-cv-01022 (D.N.J. Aug. 13, 2025)
- ArrMaz Prods. Inc v. Rieth-Riley Constr. Co Inc, No. 3:23-cv-00778 (N.D. Ind. May 6, 2025)
- Bounts Tech. Ltd. v. Connectify, Inc, No. 2:23-cv-00890 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 30, 2025)
- Kandt v. Garden City, No. 2:23-cv-02043, 2025 WL 859865 (D. Kan. Mar. 19, 2025)
- Amboh v. Kroger Co, The, No. 2:24-cv-00023 (D. Utah Mar. 18, 2025)
- LKRB Indus., LLC v. xuzhouaiyaxundianzishangwuyouxiangongsi, No. 2:24-cv-01601 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2025)
- Odunze v. Lake Effect, No. 2:24-cv-00341 (D. Utah Feb. 12, 2025)
- Slayton v. Bayfield Sch. Dist., No. 1:24-cv-00930 (D. Colo. Dec. 4, 2024)
- ADM Edible Bean Specialties, Inc. v. Am. Bean LLC, No. 0:23-cv-01096 (D. Minn. Sept. 20, 2024)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 89 opinions
- 332 opinions
- 291 opinions
- 624 opinions
- 303 opinions
- 299 opinions
- 147 opinions
- 435 opinions
Filed under: Specification; Patent; Means-plus-function
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law