Revisiting harmless error after improper questioning
Also stated as: Harmless Error and Questioning Issues
53 federal opinions cite these pages1978–202611 pages cited by federal courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Revisiting harmless error after improper questioning
- Cited for: Determining harmless error in questioning silence
- Cited for: Intent questions arising despite unambiguous release
- Cited for: Distinguishing booker error from improper questioning
- Cited for: Determining the scope of the response of ill inc
- Cited for: Determining harmless error after improper questioning
- Cited for: Harmless error in hypothetical question limitations
- Cited for: Resolving ambiguity in false answers to questions
Ranked by how often federal courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Federal opinions citing these pages
- United States v. Donald Watkins, Jr., 42 F.4th 1278 (11th Cir. 2022)
- United States v. O'Neal, No. 18-1365 (10th Cir. Dec. 5, 2019)
- Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. Warden Kent Grandlienard, 828 F.3d 658 (8th Cir. 2016)
- United States v. Linda S. Deavers, 617 F. App'x 935 (11th Cir. 2015)
- United States v. Richard William Peterson, 689 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2012)
- United States v. William Allen Broughton, No. 10-15527 (11th Cir. Aug. 10, 2012)
- United States v. Hill, 643 F.3d 807 (11th Cir. 2011)
- United States v. Phillip E. Hill, No. 07-14602 (11th Cir. June 14, 2011)
- United States v. Munoz, 605 F.3d 359 (6th Cir. 2010)
- United States v. Hubert Garland Evans, 473 F.3d 1115 (11th Cir. 2006)
- United States v. Todd Mayo, 192 F. App'x 879 (11th Cir. 2006)
- United States v. Rahseparian, D, 231 F.3d 1267 (10th Cir. 2000)
- United States v. Lopez-Benitez, No. 98-50936 (5th Cir. Oct. 18, 1999)
- United States v. Larry D. Bach, 172 F.3d 520 (7th Cir. 1999)
- United States v. Edier Tenorio, 69 F.3d 1103 (11th Cir. 1995)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 139 opinions
- 55 opinions
- 92 opinions
- 196 opinions
- 77 opinions
- 72 opinions
- 174 opinions
- 129 opinions
Filed under: Jury Instructions and Trial Error Review
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law