Interpreting good faith in interstate compact agreements
Also stated as: Ordering conditional release under interstate compact
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Interpreting good faith in interstate compact agreements
- Cited for: Interpreting legal action under an interstate compact
- Cited for: Binding nature of interstate water compacts on claimants
- Cited for: Requiring strict compliance with interstate disposition procedures
- Cited for: Tolling of interstate compact time periods under the compact clause
Ranked by how often federal courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Federal opinions citing these pages
- Texas v. New Mexico, 602 U.S. 943 (2024)
- Walker Specialty Constr., Inc. v. Bd. of Tr. of the Constr. Indus. & Laborers Jt. Pension Trust, No. 24-1560 (9th Cir. Jan. 5, 2026)
- Stormwater Plans, LLC dba SWP Contracting & Paving, No. 63900, 63901 (A.S.B.C.A. Apr. 10, 2025)
- Tpmc-Energysolutions Env't Servs. 2008, LLC v. United States, No. 19-102 (Fed. Cl. Mar. 28, 2025)
- Cont'l Gen. Ins. Co. v. Gardina, 773 F. Supp. 3d 1294 (M.D. Fla. 2025)
- Foster v. Echols Cnty. Sch. Dist., No. 7:23-cv-00089 (M.D. Ga. June 13, 2024)
- Trident Eng'g & Procurement, P.C., No. 60541, 62144 (A.S.B.C.A. May 8, 2023)
- New York v. New Jersey, 598 U.S. 218 (2023)
- State of Ohio v. United States, No. 20-288 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 7, 2022)
- 7800 Ricchi LLC v. United States, No. 18-1798 (Fed. Cl. Jan. 21, 2021)
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United States, No. 16-268 (Fed. Cl. May 4, 2020)
- Zebel LLC v. United States, No. 16-420 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 26, 2017)
- Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United States, 134 Fed. Cl. 219 (Fed. Cl. 2017)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 15 opinions
- 125 opinions
- 94 opinions
- 64 opinions
- 292 opinions
- 29 opinions
- 121 opinions
- 254 opinions
Filed under: Statutory; Construction; Language
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law