Determining essential functions and interactive process requirements
Also stated as: Requirements for case processing and data standards
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining essential functions and interactive process requirements
- Cited for: Determining essential functions and interactive process requirements
- Cited for: Analyzing the purpose and application of the demand requirement
- Cited for: Determining required level of asset scheduling detail
- Cited for: Analyzing requirements for processing award claims
- Cited for: Determining standing and purpose of best data requirement
- Cited for: Determining if ACP is temporal or monetary requirement
- Cited for: Determining scope of work and trade usage knowledge
Ranked by how often federal courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Federal opinions citing these pages
- Mills, No. 1:25-cv-03958 (D. Md. Sept. 3, 2026)
- Spears, No. 3:24-cv-00716 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 11, 2026)
- Sullivan, No. 3:22-cv-00116 (W.D. Pa. July 29, 2026)
- White, No. 2:24-cv-10160 (E.D. Mich. July 6, 2026)
- Kibler, No. 2:23-cv-02466 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 13, 2026)
- Besada, No. 3:24-cv-00313 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 23, 2025)
- Donna Jones v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. Bd., No. 24-1444 (4th Cir. Oct. 3, 2025)
- Metcalf v. State of Michigan, No. 4:21-cv-12242 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 30, 2025)
- Lonergan v. Gallagher Sharp, LLP, No. 1:24-cv-02067 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 5, 2025)
- Leanna Coffman v. Nexstar Media Inc., No. 23-2253 (4th Cir. July 22, 2025)
- Root v. Decorative Paint Inc., No. 3:21-cv-01552 (N.D. Ohio July 16, 2025)
- Lonergan v. Gallagher Sharp, LLP, No. 1:24-cv-02067 (N.D. Ohio July 10, 2025)
- Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. William Beaumont Hosp., No. 4:23-cv-11560 (E.D. Mich. July 2, 2025)
- Sally Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins Univ. Applied Physics Lab, 141 F.4th 568 (4th Cir. 2025)
- Jones v. Henhouse Inc., No. 2:22-cv-02137 (D. Ariz. May 23, 2025)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 508 opinions
- 284 opinions
- 545 opinions
- 274 opinions
- 307 opinions
- 497 opinions
- 51 opinions
- 169 opinions
Filed under: Disability Accommodation and Reasonable Adjustments
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law