Determining appropriate relief when record is not clear
Also stated as: Reviewing Record Errors and Harmless Error
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Determining appropriate relief when record is not clear
- Cited for: Consulting entire record when assessing error's effect
- Cited for: Determining harmless error on the whole record
- Cited for: Determining harmless error regarding record deficiencies
- Cited for: Assessing error by viewing record as a whole
- Cited for: Observing the harmless error standard in the record
- Cited for: Determining clear error in reviewing the entire record
- Cited for: Determining proper service and record error
Ranked by how often federal courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Federal opinions citing these pages
- Nicely, No. 1:25-cv-00391 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 22, 2026)
- Bauer, No. 3:25-cv-00232 (S.D. Ind. July 24, 2026)
- Cooksey, No. 3:25-cv-00217 (S.D. Ind. June 2, 2026)
- Merriman, No. 2:24-cv-00241 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 6, 2026)
- Wright, No. 3:24-cv-00562 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 6, 2026)
- Groves, No. 3:25-cv-00051 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2026)
- Irwin, No. 3:24-cv-00528 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 27, 2026)
- Parker, No. 4:25-cv-04004 (C.D. Ill. Jan. 16, 2026)
- N.M.C., No. 3:25-cv-00057 (S.D. Ind. Dec. 19, 2025)
- Gardner, No. 3:24-cv-00817 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 21, 2025)
- Jones v. Bisignano, No. 3:25-cv-00019 (S.D. Ind. Oct. 7, 2025)
- Elhenicky-Acosta v. Bisignano, No. 1:23-cv-16998 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 26, 2025)
- Harris v. Bisignano, No. 1:24-cv-01205 (S.D. Ind. Aug. 8, 2025)
- Gahwiler v. Dudek, No. 1:21-cv-01971 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 27, 2025)
- Mcdaniel v. Dudek, No. 1:23-cv-01315 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 27, 2025)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 26 opinions
- 113 opinions
- 41 opinions
- 24 opinions
- 80 opinions
- 7 opinions
- 6 opinions
- 64 opinions
Filed under: Appellate Procedure and Sanctions
Where else it is alive
Opinions per jurisdiction citing these pages. A span that stops early can mean the doctrine was dropped there.
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law