Describing the patented method for reflow soldering
Also stated as: Thermal processing and material characterization methods
39 federal opinions cite these pages1975–20207 pages cited by federal courts
The pages courts cite for it
- Cited for: Describing the patented method for reflow soldering
- Cited for: Distinguishing evaporative from absorptive drying process
- Cited for: Describing the claimed method of impregnating resin absorbent material
- Cited for: Analyzing zone drying and disclaimer of top air drying
- Cited for: Describing methods for sample preparation in thermal analysis
- Cited for: Distinguishing batch from continuous flow treatment methods
- Cited for: Analyzing water content and infrared spectra of lots
Ranked by how often federal courts cite each page. The bar is how citing opinions treated that page (green followed, yellow questioned or limited, red negative); a red or yellow chip is the case’s own overall treatment.
Federal opinions citing these pages
- Indivior Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Labs. S.A., No. 2:17-cv-07111, 2020 WL 4932547 (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2020)
- Indivior Inc. v. Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-07106 (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2020)
- Indivior, Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Labs. S.A., No. 1:14-cv-01451 (D. Del. Apr. 23, 2020)
- Indivior Inc. v. Alvogen Pine Brook, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-07106 (D.N.J. Nov. 5, 2019)
- Indivior Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Labs. S.A., No. 2:17-cv-07111 (D.N.J. Nov. 5, 2019)
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien, Inc., 796 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
- 3M Innovative Props. Co. v. GDC, Inc., 109 F. Supp. 3d 1115 (D. Minn. 2015)
- Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chem. Co., 642 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
- Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 749 F. Supp. 2d 130 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)
- TDM Am., LLC v. United States, 92 Fed. Cl. 761 (Fed. Cl. 2010)
- TDM Am., LLC v. United States, 85 Fed. Cl. 774 (Fed. Cl. 2009)
- Chem. Separation Tech., Inc. v. United States, 71 Fed. Cl. 135 (Fed. Cl. 2006)
- Texas Digit. Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
- Bell Atl. Network Servs., Inc. v. Covad Commc'ns Grp., Inc., 262 F.3d 1258 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
From the opinions citing the top pages above (up to 400 per page are read), most pages cited first, then newest.
Nearest issues
- 156 opinions
- 147 opinions
- 109 opinions
- 69 opinions
- 112 opinions
- 57 opinions
- 147 opinions
- 43 opinions
Filed under: Intellectual Property and Technical Law
How this is built: each issue is a set of opinion pages that later courts cite for the same proposition, grouped from what the citing courts wrote. Names are machine-written from those citations; read the cases before relying on them. Search case law