Hall v. State, 932 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Hall v. State, 932 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Borders v. State, 941 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Joe Clayton HALL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
2D05-2561.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jun 30, 2006.
Published opinion
932 So. 2d 1169
2006 WL 1788470
Canady.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

CANADY, Judge.

Joe Clayton Hall appeals his conviction and sentence for sale of cocaine and resisting an officer without violence. We affirm Hall's conviction without comment. However, the State concedes that the trial court erred in imposing $80 in costs of prosecution because the State failed to document its request for costs. See Howard v. State, 920 So.2d 764, 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Hill v. State, 845 So.2d 310, 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Tucker v. State, 832 So.2d 840, 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Because the State failed to meet its burden of demonstrating the amount of costs incurred as required by section 938.27(4), Florida Statutes (2004), we strike the $80 costs of prosecution and remand to the trial court with directions that such costs may be reimposed following the State's production of the required documentation. See Howard, 920 So.2d at 765; Hill, 845 So.2d at 311; Tucker, 832 So.2d at 841.

Conviction affirmed; costs award stricken; remanded with instructions.

DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.